Background Information

Number of voters: about 65 in 1768, 105 in 1788

Number of seats
1
Constituency business
County
Date Candidate Votes
9 May 1754 WALTER SCOTT
16 Apr. 1761 WALTER SCOTT
20 June 1765 GILBERT ELLIOT vice Scott, appointed to office
5 Feb. 1767 SIR GILBERT ELLIOT re-elected after appointment to office
11 Apr. 1768 SIR GILBERT ELLIOT
22 Mar. 1770 ELLIOT re-elected after appointment to office
20 Oct. 1774 SIR GILBERT ELLIOT
27 Feb. 1777 SIR GILBERT ELLIOT, Bt. vice Sir Gilbert Elliot, 3rd Bt., deceased
4 Oct. 1780 SIR GILBERT ELLIOT
43
Lord Robert Ker
34
15 Apr. 1784 GEORGE DOUGLAS
Main Article

The principal interests in Roxburghshire belonged to John Ker, 3rd Duke of Roxburghe, and Henry Scott, 3rd Duke of Buccleuch, both under age in 1755. During their minorities, Walter Scott of Harden, chief by male descent of ‘all the Scotts in the south of Scotland’, was virtually in control of the county. On leaving Parliament in 1765, Scott arranged the return of Gilbert Elliot of Minto, who held the seat unopposed until his death in 1777.

At the by-election Sir Gilbert Elliot, 4th Bt., declared himself a candidate, relying on the support of Buccleuch and Scott and the great prestige of his father with the independent lairds. Lord Robert Ker, the Duke of Roxburghe’s brother, also proposed to stand, but was persuaded by Buccleuch to withdraw.1Lady Minto, Mem. Hugh Elliot, 102-3. But Ker’s challenge was merely postponed, and Elliot began to create votes in preparation for the general election. In 1780 he defeated Ker with a majority of seven.2Edinburgh Advertiser, 3 Oct. 1780.

In 1784 Elliot, by his opposition to Pitt, lost Buccleuch’s support; and when Buccleuch joined Roxburghe in support of George Douglas of Springwood Park, Elliot had no hope of success and withdrew before the poll.

Author
Notes
  • 1. Lady Minto, Mem. Hugh Elliot, 102-3.
  • 2. Edinburgh Advertiser, 3 Oct. 1780.