Right of election
in inhabitant householders and in the freemen
Background Information
Number of voters: about 500
Number of seats
2
Constituency business
County
| Date | Candidate | Votes |
|---|---|---|
| 15 Apr. 1754 | NATHANIEL BRASSEY | |
| GEORGE HARRISON | ||
| 13 Dec. 1759 | GEORGE COWPER, Visct. Fordwich, vice Harrison, deceased | |
| 26 Mar. 1761 | JOHN CALVERT | |
| TIMOTHY CASWALL | ||
| 17 Mar. 1768 | JOHN CALVERT | |
| WILLIAM COWPER | ||
| 15 Jan. 1770 | PAUL FEILDE vice Cowper, deceased | 244 |
| Lionel Lyde | 122 |
|
| 8 Oct. 1774 | JOHN CALVERT | |
| PAUL FEILDE | ||
| 7 Sept. 1780 | THOMAS DIMSDALE | 286 |
| WILLIAM BAKER | 256 |
|
| John Calvert | 241 |
|
| 30 Mar. 1784 | JOHN CALVERT | 365 |
| THOMAS DIMSDALE | 292 |
|
| William Baker | 223 |
Main Article
Hertford was an independent borough, generally reckoned one of the most uncorrupt in the kingdom. ‘The Dissenting interest is very considerable there’, wrote Paul Feilde in 1769,1Add. 35639, f. 124. particularly the Quakers. The representatives were nearly all drawn from local gentry; and the leading families concerned in the borough were the Harrisons of Balls Park, the Cowpers of Panshanger, the Calverts, and the Dimsdale and Brassey families. But almost any substantial Hertfordshire country gentleman would have had a chance. Since the number of honorary freemen could not exceed three, the borough was free from the worst excesses of corporation influence.
Volume
Notes
- 1. Add. 35639, f. 124.