Right of election

in the corporation

Background Information

Number of voters: about 70

Number of seats
2
Constituency business
County
Date Candidate Votes
18 Apr. 1754 SIR THOMAS ROBINSON
JOHN MORDAUNT
21 Nov. 1755 ROBINSON re-elected after appointment to office
31 Mar. 1761 THOMAS ROBINSON
JAMES HARRIS
28 Dec. 1762 HARRIS re-elected after appointment to office
23 Apr. 1763 HARRIS re-elected after appointment to office
18 Nov. 1766 ROBINSON re-elected after appointment to office
19 Mar. 1768 THOMAS ROBINSON
JAMES HARRIS
1 Mar. 1770 ROBINSON re-elected after appointment to office
20 Nov. 1770 JAMES HARRIS jun. vice Robinson, called to the Upper House
8 Oct. 1774 JAMES HARRIS SEN.
THOMAS VILLIERS
15 June 1779 THOMAS VILLIERS, Lord Hyde, re-elected after vacating his seat
9 Sept. 1780 JAMES HARRIS SEN.
SIR JAMES HARRIS
29 Jan. 1781 JOHN FREDERICK vice James Harris sen., deceased
2 Apr. 1784 SIR JAMES HARRIS
SIR JOHN FREDERICK
23 Oct. 1788 HANS SLOANE vice Harris, called to the Upper House
Main Article

According to Oldfield, the corporation had arrogated to themselves the right of election, ‘without any opposition from the inhabitants’,1Boroughs (1792), ii. 277. and Christchurch was in effect a corporation borough. For most of this period it was controlled by Edward Hooper, M.P. for Christchurch 1735-48 and commissioner of customs 1748-93, who returned his cousin, James Harris, and generally placed the other seat at the disposal of Administration. About 1789 George Rose, secretary to the Treasury, who had purchased an estate in Hampshire, succeeded in obtaining control over one seat.

Author
Notes
  • 1. Boroughs (1792), ii. 277.