Right of election

in burgage holders

Background Information

Number of voters: 300-350

Constituency business
County
Date Candidate Votes
29 Jan. 1715 LEONARD BILSON
NORTON POWLETT
7 Nov. 1715 SAMUEL PARGITER FULLER vice Bilson, deceased
21 Mar. 1722 EDMUND MILLER
NORTON POWLETT
Joseph Taylor
28 Jan. 1727 JOSEPH TAYLOR vice Miller, appointed to office
158
Edmund Miller
141
MILLER vice Taylor, on petition, 4 May 1727
21 Aug. 1727 JOSEPH TAYLOR
NORTON POWLETT
27 Apr. 1734 SIR WILLIAM JOLLIFFE
204
EDWARD GIBBON
184
Norton Powlett
112
27 May 1741 JOHN JOLLIFFE
223
FRANCIS FANE
215
Norton Powlett
144
— Barnard
120
24 Nov. 1746 FANE re-elected after appointment to office
2 July 1747 JOHN JOLLIFFE
WILLIAM CONOLLY
9 Feb. 1754 WILLIAM GERARD HAMILTON vice Conolly, deceased
Main Article

During this period the electorate of Petersfield was enlarged by the practice of splitting some of the ancient burgages into several separate tenements, which were then conveyed temporarily to friends or agents of the candidates. In the petition proceedings after the by-election in 1727, the petitioner and the sitting Member objected respectively to 23 and 94 split votes out of a total of 299. Similar charges were made by the petitioner in 1734.1CJ, xx. 859-61; xxii. 336.

From 1705 to 1715 Petersfield was represented by Leonard Bilson, a Tory, who owned property in the town, and Norton Powlett, a Whig, whose estate was six miles away. On Bilson’s death in 1715 his property was bought by Edmund Miller, a Whig lawyer, but the seat was filled by Samuel Pargiter Fuller, also a Whig. In 1722 Powlett was re-elected unopposed with Miller, against Joseph Taylor, a Tory lawyer, put up by Edward Gibbon, a South Sea director, who had bought the manor of Petersfield in 1719. Shortly before the general election of 1727, Miller’s acceptance of office led to a by-election, at which he was defeated by Taylor, who was unseated on petition but was returned unopposed with Powlett at the ensuing general election. In 1734 John Jolliffe, who had acquired property in Petersfield through his first wife, returned his uncle, Sir William Jolliffe, Powlett losing his seat to Gibbon’s son, the historian’s father, who had recently come of age. Jolliffe gained control of the second seat in 1739 by purchasing the manor of Petersfield from the second Edward Gibbon, thenceforth returning both Members.2H. G.H. Jolliffe, Jolliffes of Petersfield, 34.

Author
Notes
  • 1. CJ, xx. 859-61; xxii. 336.
  • 2. H. G.H. Jolliffe, Jolliffes of Petersfield, 34.