in the freemen
Number of voters: from about 60 to nearly 400
Date | Candidate | Votes |
---|---|---|
4 Feb. 1715 | THOMAS STRANGWAYS HORNER | 44 |
MAURICE BERKELEY | 43 |
|
William Coward | 22 |
|
William Piers | 13 |
|
COWARD and PIERS vice Horne and Berkeley, on petition, 30 May 1716 | ||
27 June 1716 | THOMAS STRANGWAYS HORNER vice Coward, deceased | 221 |
John Dodd | 95 |
|
DODD vice Horner, on petition, 12 Apr. 1717 | ||
14 Dec. 1719 | THOMAS EDWARDS vice Dodd, deceased | |
William Bridges | ||
23 Mar. 1722 | THOMAS EDWARDS | 235 |
FRANCIS GWYN | 228 |
|
George Hamilton | 147 |
|
William Piers | 147 |
|
21 Aug. 1727 | THOMAS EDWARDS | 198 |
EDWARD PRIDEAUX GWYN | 191 |
|
William Piers | 102 |
|
PIERS vice Gwyn, on petition, 18 Apr. 1729 | ||
30 Apr. 1734 | GEORGE HAMILTON | 138 |
THOMAS EDWARDS | 136 |
|
William Piers | 126 |
|
George Speke | 125 |
|
PIERS and SPEKE vice Hamilton and Edwards, on petition, 25 Mar. 1735 | ||
14 May 1741 | GEORGE SPEKE | |
FRANCIS GWYN | ||
29 June 1747 | GEORGE HAMILTON | 182 |
FRANCIS GWYN | 152 |
|
William Piers | 64 |
|
George Speke | 62 |
Elections at Wells were controlled by the corporation, a Tory body, who could manipulate the franchise by creating honorary freemen and through the power of the mayor as returning officer to decide who was entitled to vote. At every election but that of 1741, which was compromised, there was a contest on party lines, resulting in the return of the opposition candidates, followed by a petition from the unsuccessful government candidates, alleging partiality and malpractices on the part of the returning officer. Except in 1719, 1722, and 1747, when the sitting Members were allowed to retain their seats, the petitioners were seated by the use of the ministerial majority. In 1735, when William Piers and George Speke were awarded the seats, the Court, Edward Harley writes, ‘were so angry’ at losing divisions on the right of election at Wells that
they summoned their whole force and all their troops, being resolved to carry their Members though they had lost that city. Note Mr. Piers was never chose by this city, yet had been twice duly elected by the House of Commons.1Harly Diary, 25 Mar. 1735.
- 1. Harly Diary, 25 Mar. 1735.