Number of voters: at least 35
Date | Candidate | Votes |
---|---|---|
22 June 1790 | HENRY ADDINGTON | |
JOSHUA SMITH | ||
30 May 1796 | HENRY ADDINGTON | |
JOSHUA SMITH | ||
25 Feb. 1801 | ADDINGTON re-elected after vacating his seat | |
21 Mar. 1801 | ADDINGTON re-elected after appointment to office | |
5 July 1802 | HENRY ADDINGTON | |
JOSHUA SMITH | ||
23 Jan. 1805 | THOMAS GRIMSTON ESTCOURT vice Addington, called to the Upper House | |
4 Nov. 1806 | JOSHUA SMITH | |
THOMAS GRIMSTON ESTCOURT | ||
6 May 1807 | JOSHUA SMITH | |
THOMAS GRIMSTON ESTCOURT | ||
10 Oct. 1812 | JOSHUA SMITH | |
THOMAS GRIMSTON ESTCOURT | ||
16 June 1818 | THOMAS GRIMSTON ESTCOURT | |
JOHN PEARSE | ||
Wadham Locke | ||
William Salmon |
In 1790 the Devizes corporation was under the prevailing influence of the leading clothier and former Member, James Sutton, whose brother-in-law Henry Addington was both recorder and Member; and of the London merchant Joshua Smith, whose residence was at Erlestoke, three miles away. In 1805, on Addington’s elevation to the peerage, Sutton’s brother-in-law was replaced by his son-in-law, a member of the corporation who, as Addington expected, was ‘chosen unanimously’.2PRO 30/8/107, f. 160. But Smith’s retirement in 1818 occasioned a contest. In a manoeuvre which caused some indignation in the borough,3See PEARSE, John. a stranger, John Pearse, put up by William Salmon, banker, attorney and deputy-recorder, who stood as well, defeated a local gentleman and succeeded in establishing his hold. His opponent, Wadham Locke, a native banker married to a Sutton, led the reform movement in the borough and later won a seat.