Right of election

in the corporation

Background Information

Number of voters: not more than 12

Constituency business
County
Date Candidate Votes
22 June 1790 JAMES STOPFORD, EARL OF COURTOWN [I]
HON. THOMAS BRUCE
28 June 1793 CHARLES WILLIAM HENRY MONTAGU SCOTT, Earl of Dalkeith, Earl of Dalkeith, vice Courtown, vacated his seat
30 May 1796 CHARLES BRUCE BRUDENELL BRUCE, Lord Bruce
HON. JAMES BRUCE
16 Nov. 1797 ROBERT BRUDENELL vice James Bruce, vacated his seat
8 July 1802 CHARLES BRUCE BRUDENELL BRUCE, Lord Bruce
JAMES HENRY LEIGH
4 Nov. 1806 CHARLES WILLIAM HENRY MONTAGU SCOTT, Earl of Dalkeith
CHARLES BRUCE BRUDENELL BRUCE, Lord Bruce
20 Apr. 1807 JAMES GEORGE STOPFORD, Visct. Stopford, Visct. Stopford, vice Dalkeith, called to the Upper House
6 May 1807 CHARLES BRUCE BRUDENELL BRUCE, Lord Bruce
JAMES GEORGE STOPFORD, Visct. Stopford
10 Apr. 1810 HON. EDWARD STOPFORD vice Stopford, called to the Upper House
9 Oct. 1812 CHARLES BRUCE BRUDENELL BRUCE, Lord Bruce
HON. EDWARD STOPFORD
9 May 1814 HON. WILLIAM HILL vice Bruce, called to the Upper House
18 June 1818 HON. JOHN WODEHOUSE
JAMES THOMAS BRUDENELL, Lord Brudenell
Main Article

Marlborough was described by Thomas Bruce, 1st Earl of Ailesbury, to his son Lord Bruce in 1802, as ‘a friendly borough’. Friendly to him, seated five miles away, it certainly was, for his nominees, most of them members of his family, were returned without demur. As at Great Bedwyn, he had only to make his choice and fix his terms. The corporation, nominally 20 in number, had long been reduced to a dozen and consisted of a mere handful of reliable supporters in this period.1Ailesbury mss, Ailesbury to Bruce, 23 June 1802; Geo. III Corresp. iv. 3428; Oldfield, Rep. Hist. v. 223. In 1794 Ailesbury was warned of a conspiratorial bid by one Clarke to fetch ‘a candidate with money’ to oppose him, but nothing came of it.2Ailesbury mss, Astle to Ailesbury, 22, 25, 27 Aug. 1794. When in 1806 Lord Dalkeith was unable to attend his election, Ailesbury informed him that it was as well his colleague Stopford had done so, as ‘any chance disappointed candidates passing through the town might have taken the advantage of only one candidate appearing’.3SRO GD224/663/10/11. But there was no such excitement, in his time or when his son the 2nd Earl assumed the patronage in 1814.

Author
Notes
  • 1. Ailesbury mss, Ailesbury to Bruce, 23 June 1802; Geo. III Corresp. iv. 3428; Oldfield, Rep. Hist. v. 223.
  • 2. Ailesbury mss, Astle to Ailesbury, 22, 25, 27 Aug. 1794.
  • 3. SRO GD224/663/10/11.