Right of election

in persons paying church and poor rates, resident or non-resident

Background Information

Number of voters: about 400

Number of seats
2
Constituency business
County
Date Candidate Votes
16 Apr. 1754 JOSEPH DAMER, Baron Milton
JOHN PITT
11 Dec. 1756 PITT re-elected after appointment to office
25 Mar. 1761 JOSEPH DAMER, Baron Milton
THOMAS FOSTER
7 May 1762 JOHN DAMER vice Milton, called to the Upper House
23 Dec. 1765 WILLIAM EWER vice Foster, deceased
16 Mar. 1768 JOHN DAMER
218
WILLIAM EWER
143
Laurence Cox
85
10 Oct. 1774 WILLIAM EWER
232
JOHN DAMER
214
Anthony Chapman
145
11 Sept. 1780 GEORGE DAMER
128
WILLIAM EWER
112
John Floyer
23
31 Mar. 1784 GEORGE DAMER
WILLIAM EWER
4 July 1789 THOMAS EWER vice William Ewer, deceased
30 Jan. 1790 CROPLEY ASHLEY vice Ewer, deceased
Main Article

There was no dominant interest, but a number of local landowners had influence: the Earl of Shaftesbury, high steward 1757-71; Lord Milton, high steward 1771-98; the Earl of Cholmondeley; and the Pitts of Encombe. There was also an independent vote. In 1754 John Pitt, one of the sitting Members, concluded a compromise with Lord Milton. Lord Malpas, defeated at Dorchester in 1752, who had intended to stand again, was persuaded by Henry Pelham to support the compromise. William Templeman, of a family of local attorneys much concerned in Dorset borough elections, wrote to Malpas, 23 Mar. 1754,1Add. 32734, f. 363. that Pitt and Milton, having disobliged the corporation, ‘the town is now in the greatest ferment, and the cry is an opposition they will have’. In the end there was no contest in 1754 nor in 1761, but an opposition they did have at the next three general elections.

Author
Notes
  • 1. Add. 32734, f. 363.