Date | Candidate | Votes |
---|---|---|
1558/59 | THOMAS VENTRIS 1E371/402(1). | |
ROGER SLEGGE 2Ibid. | ||
1562/63 | HENRY SERLE | |
ROGER SLEGGE | ||
20 Mar. 1571 | ROBERT SHUTE | |
ROGER SLEGGE | ||
18 Apr. 1572 | ROBERT SHUTE | |
ROGER SLEGGE | ||
20 Jan. 1581 | JOHN NORTH vice Shute, became a judge3C219/283/26. | |
17 Nov. 1584 | HENRY NORTH | |
ROGER SLEGGE | ||
24 Oct. 1586 | JOHN EDMONDS | |
ROGER SLEGGE | ||
16 Oct. 1588 | NICHOLAS GAUNTE | |
ROGER SLEGGE | ||
1593 | THOMAS GOLDSBOROUGH | |
CHRISTOPHER HODSON | ||
7 Oct. 1597 | ROBER WALLIS | |
JOHN YAXLEY | ||
15 Oct. 1601 | ROBERT WALLIS | |
JOHN YAXLEY |
All the Members for Cambridge in this period were townsmen, with the exception of the two North brothers, who were sons of the high steward, the 2nd Lord North, and Robert Shute the recorder, who lived outside the town. Indeed, an ordinance made in the fifteenth century to ensure that only inhabitants could be returned to Parliament, was modified in 1571 to provide for an exception in the case of the recorder. Shute had been chosen on 20 Mar., ‘resigned’ as MP on the 26th, and subsequently withdrew his ‘resignation’. The importance Cambridge attached to residence can be seen also in an incident of 1566. When the corporation wished to get rid of Serle and Slegge, one of the grounds was that they had ceased to live within the borough.
There was an ingenious system of choosing MPs. One man was selected by the mayor and aldermen, another by the common council. These two then selected eight others to choose the Members. From 1571 a majority of five would suffice. The MPs were paid 1s. a day in 1559, 2s. in 1563, 4s. in 1589, 2s. again in 1593, 4s. in 1597 and 1601. Henry North received £6 13s.4d. instead of wages.4Cooper, Cambridge Annals, ii. passim; Cambridge city archs., common day bk. 1564-77; Downing Coll. Camb., Bowtell coll. liber rationalis.