From 1790 George Nugent Temple Grenville, 1st Marquess of Buckingham, assumed sole parliamentary patronage of St. Mawes, having inherited in 1788 his father-in-law Earl Nugent’s moiety and having purchased the interest of the co-patron Hugh Boscawen, who accordingly gave up the seat he had personally occupied for 16 years at the dissolution. The Whigs found that they had no chance when they contemplated contesting the borough in 1790.
Buckingham returned his friend Sir William Young for one seat until 1806; the other went to friends of Pitt’s administration. Pitt named Calvert, who succeeded Simcoe on a vacancy in 1792 and stated that he had offered £3,000, which would be used to compensate Simcoe.
The only political tenet to which your ... electors will bind you, is the belief that the pilchard is the best of all possible fish, which as long as you are not obliged to taste it, you may undertake for their sake to believe.
The bargain proved embarrassing to Windham when he took office in 1806. Lord Grenville wished his secretary at the Treasury, John King, to have Sir William Young’s seat and it was up to Windham to find compensatory office in the West Indies for Young. King had been replaced in office by William Henry Fremantle, who was also intended for Young’s seat, as were others after him, before Windham could arrange the quid pro quo.
In 1807 Buckingham promised Fremantle, who was his candidate at Saltash, that if defeated there he would be returned for St. Mawes: but when Fremantle failed in his petition at Saltash, he found himself Member for Tain Burghs, by an arrangement of Buckingham’s to exchange seats with Lord Stafford, whose heir came in for St. Mawes. The reason for this was that Buckingham was faced with a threat at St. Mawes, engineered by James Buller II in revenge for Buckingham’s attack on his interest at Saltash. It took the form of litigation in the name of Adm. Spry and Buckingham informed Fremantle 23 Feb. 1808, ‘My first duty is to secure to my family the quiet possession of this interesting property’.
The threat had subsided by 1812, when Buckingham offered a seat to George Tierney, the Whig factotum, whom he had refused to consider in 1807. Tierney now politely refused to consider him as a patron. According to Brougham, as ‘the result (it is believed) of the debate on Creevey’s motion against Lord Buckingham’s sinecure’, the seat was earmarked for another talented Whig, Francis Horner, who came in at the expense of a dinner only, but on a proviso of general political agreement. On Horner’s death, the 2nd Marquess offered the seat to Serjeant Lens and, on his refusing it, to Phillimore, who was an instrument of Buckingham’s bid to form a third parliamentary party.
in the freemen
Number of voters: about 20
