Effective dates of sessions: 23 Nov.-21 Dec. 1584 4 Feb.-29 Mar. 1585
Speaker: | (Sir) John Puckering | |
Clerk: | Fulk Onslow |
Privy Councillors in the Commons:
Sir James Croft
(Sir) Christopher Hatton I
Sir Francis Knollys
Sir Walter Mildmay
Sir Ralph Sadler:
(Sir) Francis Walsingham
Total number of Members elected 468
for counties 91
for boroughs 377
at general election 460
for counties 90
for boroughs 370
at by-elections
8 for counties
for boroughs 7
Number of Members known to have left before end: 3, of whom 1 sat for a county, 2 for boroughs
Residential qualification. Borough Members
resident in borough 93
resident in county 120
strangers 134
no information 15
Electoral qualification. Borough Members returned through
own or family interest 78
wife’s family interest 7
corporation interest 84
‘natural’ influence 46
influence of a great man 131
duchy of Lancaster 7
no information 24
Number of Members with
central office | local office |
major 9 | lord lieutenant 5 |
minor 80 | deputy lieutenant 13 |
legal 6 | custos rotulorum 10 |
duchy of Lancaster 16 | j.p. 205 |
diplomatic/agent abroad 10 | other county 79 |
military/naval 12 | mayor 12 |
ecclesiastical 13 | recorder 16 |
other municipal 63 | |
no office in this Parliament 138 |
Experience. Members who
had sat in previous Parliament 28%
were to sit in next Parliament 52%
Activity
very active speakers 3%
very active committeemen 6%
with any recorded activity 38%
with any recorded speeches 11%
with any recorded committees 36%
served on religious committee 15%
spoke on religion 4%
served on subsidy committee 15%
spoke on subsidy 1%
served on a social/economic committee 17%
spoke on a social/economic matter 4%
served on a legal committee 14%
spoke on a legal matter 3%
served on a committee concerned with the Queen’s safety 3%
spoke on the Queen’s safety 2%
served on a committee outside above five classifications 9%
spoke on a subject other than the above five 3%
Favoured committee meeting places
Exchequer chamber 53%
Middle Temple 24%
Lincoln’s Inn 11%
House of Commons committee chamber 3%
Committees also met in Guildhall, Inner Temple, Star Chamber and Ely Place.
Sources for the names of members (unless an individual reference is given)
OR, with add. and corr.
PRO T/S list of supplementary returns
Bodl Tanner 234
Bodl. Willis 9 (see under 1571)
Add. 38823, Sir Edward Hoby’s commonplace book, post 20 Feb. 1585.
Sources for the proceedings of the Commons
Between August 1611 and November 1613 the finished journals for 1584-1601 were lost,
There is also an anonymous journal, Lansd. 43, ff. 164-75, containing many amusing stories, but amounting in Miss Miller’s edition to only 50 quarto pages of typescript. ‘The Recorder [Fleetwood] did ask leave of the House to go to the assizes, but was denied of the House. He did ask of glory, knowing they would not spare him’. But another time he reported Fleetwood as saying ‘"Our seal of London ... will fetch £100,000 upon it at Antwerp, but you cannot borrow five groats there upon all your seals in Wales ... For mine own part I care not for I have never foot of land in Wales, nor never intend to have", and so he went out of the House presently to the indictment of [William] Parry in the King’s bench’. Fleetwood kept his own record of the opening days of this Parliament 23-28 Nov., Lansd. 41. Another journal was kept by William Fitzwilliam, Northants. RO, Fitzwilliam of Milton mss 2, amounting to 137 quarto pages of typescript. It is a major contribution to knowledge of the proceedings of this Parliament, concentrating as it does on the speeches of Fitzwilliam’s Northamptonshire neighbour, father-in-law and fellow puritan, Sir Walter Mildmay and the major issues of the Parliament, the Queen’s safety, the bill against Jesuits, the petition to the Lords on religious grievances, the linking of the subsidy bill with religion, and the bill for the reformation of disorders touching ministers of the Church. Fitzwilliam followed Bell and other radical religious reformers in using a device later adopted by opponents of the Crown in the early seventeenth century, that of extracting precedents from medieval and Tudor records to support his argument with little regard for historical accuracy.
Other sources for the proceedings of this Parliament are: Add. 5758, 48064; Lansd. 43, 98, 104, 115; Harl. 6853, 540; SP Dom. Eliz. 176/51, 55, 73; Petyt 538/38; Fitzwilliam of Milton mss 192.