In the 1530s, John Leland visited Pembroke when it could glory in its fame as the birthplace of Henry VII, and he was evidently impressed by the impregnable castle and the stout town walls. Even then, however, the eastern suburb of the town was in ruins, hinting that prosperity was not easily sustained in south-west Wales. A pattern of decay and depopulation persisted well into the seventeenth century.
Hugh Owen of Orielton, only two miles from Pembroke, had in 1626 staked his claim to the patronage of this constituency and thereby established a family hold that was to last until 1868. Yet he was returned to the Short Parliament for Haverfordwest. Sir John Stepney of Prendergast had offered his services gratis to the corporation of Haverfordwest in January 1640, but nevertheless the switch took place, and Stepney sat for Pembroke. It remains unexplained, but was evidently a convenient arrangement and was probably entirely collusive.
Because the town lost separate representation under the Cromwellian Instrument of Government, Pembroke did not again return a Member until 1659. On that occasion, the contestants were the Owens of Orielton and the Lort family. The mayor of Pembroke, the returning officer, was John Lort of Pricaston, Castlemartin, the youngest of three brothers. Like the Owens, the political behaviour of the Lorts had been ambivalent during the first civil war. According to Mayor Lort’s detailed account of the election, he received the precept from the high sheriff and convened the bailiffs and aldermen of Pembroke on 8 January 1659.
After giving two days’ notice, the mayor began election proceedings on 17 January. On that day James Philipps insisted on an interview with him beforehand and made no impression on the mayor despite his warning that he had mustered voters from the out-boroughs. At the town hall Sir Hugh Owen requested that James Philipps and Essex Meyrick (son of Sir John Meyrick*) should be made freemen, which being refused by the corporation members, ‘a company of strangers, and pretended burgesses of out-boroughs (having too much drink given them that morning, on the charge of the said James Philipps) fell into a great mutiny’ in which the mayor and his eldest brother Roger, ‘a sickly and infirm man’ were assaulted, and the election was postponed until Wednesday following. The forename of Essex Meyrick is a sufficient indication of his likely political adherence to the conservative, Presbyterian gentry interest, probably by this time inclining to royalism. Owen’s attempt to co-opt both Philipps and Meyrick suggests an effort to forge an electoral pact between Cromwellians and Presbyterian against the more radical Lort.
Before the mayor left the meeting on 17 January, he was threatened with replacement by the town clerk and assailed by Sir Hugh Owen who wished to deprive him of the precept in his pocket. In an afternoon session on town business, Arthur Owen ‘in a great passion suddenly offered himself to serve in Parliament for the said town’. The mayor advised him to attend the election on Wednesday, but Owen demurred:
if he were chosen on Wednesday, he should judge it no legal election, and making other excuses, before he went from the place, publicly denied to serve in Parliament for them, and declared that he gave his voice to Colonel Clerke.
The mayor denied that he ordered a ‘guard of halberds’ to exclude the out-burgesses: ‘if any did order them, it was some friend of Mr James Philipps’, whom he also accused of offering the Tenby freemen a barrel of ale among them and 6d each to support his candidate at Pembroke.
At the next meeting of the proceedings, on 19 January, the mayor claimed there was ‘no man there to stand for the election’ at the town hall, and his proposal of Sampson Lort was adopted and followed by his almost unanimous return, after Philipps had asserted himself as representing the central government; he
told the mayor he was there as a public minister of state to take notice of his doings, and threatened the mayor, that he would make him go to London, because he would not do as he would have him.
There had been no demand for a poll, however. Philipps then allegedly intimidated various freemen into signing ‘Mr Owen’s certificate’, after they had desired their names to be inserted in the indenture for Sampson Lort. The two bailiffs complained to the mayor that Philipps had threatened them with fines of £1,500. The statement of the Lort case was a reply in print to their opponents’ own The State of the Election of a Burgess to Serve in Parliament for the Shire-Town of Pembroke, which has not been traced. There is nevertheless a statement of Owen’s case attached to the indenture of return of Sampson Lort, which survives. This petition embodies a statement of Owen’s election, and was treated as a return.
According to the Lorts’ pamphlet, the only source, when the indenture and petition reached the House the controversy over the election, reified in the form of the return, was ‘appointed to be heard’ on 2 April 1659. However, there is no evidence that the case was resolved or even debated.
Right of election: in the freemen of Pembroke, Tenby and Wiston.
Number of voters: 44 in 1659