Nottinghamshire

<p><b>Economic and social profile</b></p><p>Bounded on the north-east by Lincolnshire and on the north-west by Yorkshire, the hundred of Bassetlaw comprised more than two-fifths of the area of the county of Nottinghamshire, but only one-fifth of its population. Agriculturally diverse, the hundred contained over 200,000 acres, which were mostly arable and meadow, and produced wheat, barley, oats and turnips.

<p><strong>Economic and social profile:</strong></p><p>Located on the river Trent, the economy of the county town of Nottingham was dominated by the hosiery industry and its subsidiary lace making. With the population chiefly employed in the manufacture of lace, cotton, silk and bobbinet, and in accessory operations such as dyeing, bleaching and engine making, the influence of the textile trades was considerable.<fn>S.D. Chapman, ‘Industry and Trade’, in J.

<p>Nottingham at the end of the 17th century was generally esteemed a pleasant town. In 1697 Celia Fiennes remarked that it was ‘the neatest town I have seen, built of stone and delicate large and long streets, much like London and the houses lofty and well built’. In her description she referred to the homes of the Duke of Newcastle (John Holles†), the Earl of Kingston (Evelyn Pierrepont*) and Sir Thomas Willoughby, 2nd Bt.*, thereby inadvertently identifying three of the most important political interests in the borough.

<p>Newark was exposed to influence from several quarters. Magnate influence was represented by Lord Lexington, whose residence at Averham overlooked the town, and later by the Duke of Newcastle (John Holles†) who gradually increased his property in the borough. The gentry from the surrounding area, including neighbouring Lincolnshire, dominated the representation of the borough, although their manoeuvres were carefully watched over by the corporation.

<p>East Retford was the main market town in the northernmost hundred of the shire. As such it played host to the quarter sessions which were held by adjournment from Nottingham and Newark. In size, it was little more than a village. Politically, the corporation, which consisted of two bailiffs and 12 aldermen, was not strong enough to resist the electoral power of the surrounding gentry, who monopolized the seats in this period.<fn> J. S. Piercy, <em>Hist. Retford</em>, 1, 7, 10; J. D. Chambers, <em>Notts. in 18th Cent</em>. 51, 79; A.

<p>In 1754 East Retford was under the patronage of the Duke of Newcastle. It was managed by John White, M.P. for the borough since 1733, a close friend of Newcastle, who had some interest of his own. Newcastle’s hold on the borough was considered sure, and there was no opposition in 1754 or 1761.</p><p>But Newcastle’s position could not be taken for granted. His control of the corporation had been secured largely through the patronage of the Crown, and care was taken to keep the principal citizens in good humour.

<p>The chief interest in 1754 was in the Duke of Newcastle, lord of the manor of Newark. Next came that of the Sutton family which, through the marriage to the 3rd Duke of Rutland of the daughter and heir of the last Lord Lexinton, passed to <a href="/landingpage/58399" title="Lord Robert Manners Sutton" class="link">Lord Robert Manners Sutton</a>.

<p>Local landowners had a good deal of influence in Nottingham, particularly the Duke of Newcastle, leader of the Whigs, and Lord Middleton, leader of the Tories. The Dissenters were strong in the town, and in the second half of the eighteenth century controlled the corporation (to whose support the Howes owed their influence). Abel Smith, the leading local banker, had a strong interest, based on his ability to grant credit to the small manufacturers who formed a fair proportion of the voters.