ACTON, Whitmore (1678-1732), of Aldenham Hall, nr. Bridgnorth, Salop.
Freeman, Much Wenlock 1695, Ludlow 1697; sheriff, Salop 1728–9.
ACTON, Whitmore (1678-1732)
Freeman, Much Wenlock 1695, Ludlow 1697; sheriff, Salop 1728–9.
ACTON, Whitmore (1678-1732)
Freeman, Bridgnorth 1673, recorder 1686–d.; freeman, Much Wenlock 1676, bailiff 1686–7; sheriff, Salop 1684–5; freeman, Ludlow 1697.
ACTON, Sir Edward, 3rd Bt. (c.1650-1716)
Freeman, Wilton 1710–d.
A’COURT, Pierce (c.1677-1725)
ACLAND, Richard (1679-1729)
ACLAND, John (c.1674-1703)
Freeman, Fishmongers’ Co. 1666, asst. 1691, prime warden 1704; common councilman, London 1689–90, alderman 1692, sheriff 1693, ld. mayor 1700–1.
Commr. taking subscriptions to Bank of Eng. 1694, 1709, Greenwich Hosp. 1695; dir. Bank of Eng. 1694–d. (with statutory intervals); trustee, receiving loan to Emperor 1706.
Manager, Common Fund 1695; member, New England Co. by 1698; pres. St. Thomas’ Hosp. 1707–d.
ABNEY, Sir Thomas (1640-1722)
Clerk in Chancery 1670–82; commr. of public accts. 1694–5.
Freeman, Leicester 1690; Fishmongers’ Co. 1696.
ABNEY, Sir Edward (1631-1728)
Ensign 1 Ft. (R. Scots) 1696, half-pay 1697, capt. 1701, brevet maj. 1706, lt.-col. 1709– Dec. 1710, Mar. 1711–17, brevet col. Nov. 1711; capt. and lt.-col. Coldstream Gds. Dec. 1710–Mar. 1711; a.d.c. to Earl of Orkney 1704–c.1709; town maj. Dunkirk 1712–?16; commr. inspecting demolition Dunkirk fortifications 1713–16.
ABERCROMBY, James (d. 1724)
Commr. justiciary for Highlands [S] 1701, 1702; lt. 21 Ft. (R. Scots Fusiliers) 1706, capt. 1707, lt.-col. (half-pay) 1721; commr. Equivalent [S] 1707–19; a.d.c. to Duke of Marlborough (John Churchill†) in Low Countries 1711; lt. gov. Fort William 1726–?d.
MP [S] Banffshire 1706–7.
Burgess, Edinburgh 1724.
ABERCROMBY, Alexander (1678-1729)
Wigtown Burghs failed to implement the order of rotation prescribed by the act of the Scottish parliament for settling the post-Union representation. Ignorance rather than calculation of advantage caused this uniquely aberrant behaviour; but the right of presiding at elections was particularly significant in a four-burgh district, where the presiding burgh’s casting vote in a tied election would be decisive.