Constituency | Dates |
---|---|
Flint Boroughs | 1659 |
Evesham | 29 Oct. 1669, 1661 |
Flintshire | 1681 |
Flint Boroughs | 1685, 1689 |
Local: commr. assessment, Flint 29 May 1656, 9 June 1657, 26 Jan. 1660, 1661, 1664, 1666, 1672, 1677, 1679, 1689 – d.; Denb. 29 May 1656; Suff. 1660, 1672, 1677, 1679, 1689; Worcs. 1672, 1677. 1660 – 11 June 16806An Order and Declaration (1656, E.1065.7); A. and O.; SR. J.p. Flint Mar., 20 Aug. 1680–19 Sept. 1691;7Justices of the Peace ed. Phillips, 120, 124. Suff. by Oct. 1660–80. Commr. poll tax, 1660; Flint 1666.8SR. Kpr. of the game, N. Wales Dec. 1660–d.9CSP Dom. 1660–1, p. 431; 1700–2, p. 512. Capt. militia horse, Flint c.1661-aft. 1684.10CSP Dom. 1661–2, p. 145; T. Dineley [Dingley], An Account of the Progress of his Grace Henry the first Duke of Beaufort through Wales, 1684 ed. C. Baker, 88. Commr. loyal and indigent officers, Suff. 1662; subsidy, Flint 1663, 1689.11SR. Sheriff, Glos. 1664–5.12CSP Dom. 1664–5, p. 96. Commr. recusants, Worcs. 1675.13CTB iv. 698. Dep. lt. Flint June 1685–d.14CSP Dom. 1685, p. 189; 1687–9, p. 152; 1700–2, p. 256.
Court: gent. of privy chamber, extraordinary, c.June 1660–?15LC3/2, f. 9.
Military: : capt. of horse, regt. of Charles, 1st Baron Gerard, Nov. 1662-aft. July 1666;16CSP Dom. 1661–2, p. 577; 1665–6, p. 557. capt. of ft. regt. of 2nd duke of Buckingham by May 1673–?;17CSP Dom. 1673, p. 215. capt. of ft. Ireland by Jan. 1678–?;18HMC Ormonde, ii. 210, 215. lt.-col. c.June 1685-at least Dec. 1688;19CSP Dom. 1685, p. 214; Hanmer, Par. and Fam. of Hanmer, 126. col. by Apr. 1689–d.;20CSP Dom. 1689–90, p. 48; 1700–2, p. 511. brig. 25 Sept. 1689–d.21CSP Dom. 1691–2, p. 57; 1700–2, p. 328. Gov. Cork by Mar. 1692–?22CTB ix. 1664; CSP Dom. 1691–2, p. 338.
Irish: commr. revenue inspection, Mar. 1676-c.1680.23CTB v. 180; HMC Ormonde, n.s. v. 493–4. PC, July 1695–d.24CSP Dom. 1695, p. 5. MP, Carlingford, co. Louth 1695–9.25HP Commons 1660–1690, ‘Sir John Hanmer’.
Likenesses: oil on canvas, J. Riley, bef. 1691.27Whereabouts unknown.
Hanmer spent his formative years on the continent, where his father, Sir Thomas Hanmer – a reluctant royalist officer who had quit Wales and the civil war in 1644 – found solace during the later 1640s and early 1650s. Having returned to Flintshire in 1651, Sir Thomas spent the remainder of the interregnum re-building his estate and establishing himself as one of his generation’s most innovative and influential horticulturalists. He exploited his links with the Independents in the 1640s, and his expertise as a plantsman, to cultivate a network of friends at the Cromwellian court that included Oliver St John* and Major-general John Lambert*.28Infra, ‘Sir Thomas Hanmer’; Hanmer, Par. and Fam. of Hanmer, 128. He and his family’s success in adapting to the new political climate was reflected in Hanmer’s nomination to the Denbighshire and Flintshire assessment commission in 1656 and in his return for Flint Boroughs to Richard Cromwell’s* Parliament in 1659. He received no committee appointments in this Parliament, however, and his only recorded contribution to its proceedings came during a debate on the Cromwellian Other House, on 22 February, when he moved that it should comprise those peers summoned by the protector and as many members of the old peerage ‘as are capable to be called in’ – subject in the case of both groups to approval by the Commons.29Burton’s Dairy, iii. 409. At some point during the late 1650s or early in 1660, he contributed £600 to the royal cause, for which he was rewarded at the Restoration with a knighthood, appointment as a gentleman of the privy chamber and inclusion on the list of knights of the proposed but never inaugurated order of the royal oak.30Hanmer, Par. and Fam. of Hanmer, 123; Shaw, Knights of Eng. ii. 231; Jenkins, ‘Wales and the Order of the Royal Oak’, 345.
Although Hanmer married an heiress and would inherit a sizeable estate in Flintshire as well as property in Gloucestershire and Suffolk, his extravagance meant that he suffered frequent outlawries and was hard pushed to avoid arrest for debt. When he was returned, on the court interest, for Evesham to the Cavalier Parliament in 1669, he was described as ‘a privy chamber man, vastly in debt’. Like his father, he was a member of the court faction at Westminster and was marked ‘doubly vile’ by the leader of the ‘country’ interest, the earl of Shaftesbury (Sir Anthony Ashley Cooper*), in 1677. He made little impact as a knight of the shire for Flintshire in the Parliament of 1681, or as MP for Flint Boroughs in 1685 and 1689. In contrast to his father, he enjoyed soldiering and spent much of the 1680s and 1690s pursuing a military career in England and Ireland. Late in 1688, during the Glorious Revolution, he and his troops secured Hull for the Williamite cause; and in 1690 he commanded a regiment of foot at the battle of the Boyne. His distinguished service as a soldier in Ireland – which brought him a place on the Irish privy council and as an MP for Carlingford – was cut short by his death in the summer of 1701, possibly as a result of fighting a duel.31HP Commons 1660-1690; A. Browning, Thomas Osborne, Earl of Danby and Duke of Leeds (Glasgow, 1944-51), ii. 142-3, 147-8; Hanmer, Par. and Fam. of Hanmer, 126-31. He was buried at Hanmer on 12 August 1701.32Hanmer, Par. and Fam. of Hanmer, 131. No will is recorded. His nephew Thomas Hanmer, who served as Speaker of the Commons in 1714-15, succeeded him as 4th (and last) baronet.33HP Commons 1690-1715, ‘Thomas Hanmer II’.
- 1. Hanmer par. reg.
- 2. Infra, ‘Sir Thomas Hanmer’; Hanmer, Par. and Fam. of Hanmer, 128.
- 3. St Gregory by St Paul, London, par. reg.; W.H. Birch, ‘Some Suff. church notes’, East Anglian, n.s. xii. 366; Hanmer, Par. and Fam. of Hanmer, 131.
- 4. Shaw, Knights of Eng. ii. 231.
- 5. Hanmer, Par. and Fam. of Hanmer, 112, 131.
- 6. An Order and Declaration (1656, E.1065.7); A. and O.; SR.
- 7. Justices of the Peace ed. Phillips, 120, 124.
- 8. SR.
- 9. CSP Dom. 1660–1, p. 431; 1700–2, p. 512.
- 10. CSP Dom. 1661–2, p. 145; T. Dineley [Dingley], An Account of the Progress of his Grace Henry the first Duke of Beaufort through Wales, 1684 ed. C. Baker, 88.
- 11. SR.
- 12. CSP Dom. 1664–5, p. 96.
- 13. CTB iv. 698.
- 14. CSP Dom. 1685, p. 189; 1687–9, p. 152; 1700–2, p. 256.
- 15. LC3/2, f. 9.
- 16. CSP Dom. 1661–2, p. 577; 1665–6, p. 557.
- 17. CSP Dom. 1673, p. 215.
- 18. HMC Ormonde, ii. 210, 215.
- 19. CSP Dom. 1685, p. 214; Hanmer, Par. and Fam. of Hanmer, 126.
- 20. CSP Dom. 1689–90, p. 48; 1700–2, p. 511.
- 21. CSP Dom. 1691–2, p. 57; 1700–2, p. 328.
- 22. CTB ix. 1664; CSP Dom. 1691–2, p. 338.
- 23. CTB v. 180; HMC Ormonde, n.s. v. 493–4.
- 24. CSP Dom. 1695, p. 5.
- 25. HP Commons 1660–1690, ‘Sir John Hanmer’.
- 26. P. Jenkins, ‘Wales and the Order of the Royal Oak’, NLWJ xxiv. 345.
- 27. Whereabouts unknown.
- 28. Infra, ‘Sir Thomas Hanmer’; Hanmer, Par. and Fam. of Hanmer, 128.
- 29. Burton’s Dairy, iii. 409.
- 30. Hanmer, Par. and Fam. of Hanmer, 123; Shaw, Knights of Eng. ii. 231; Jenkins, ‘Wales and the Order of the Royal Oak’, 345.
- 31. HP Commons 1660-1690; A. Browning, Thomas Osborne, Earl of Danby and Duke of Leeds (Glasgow, 1944-51), ii. 142-3, 147-8; Hanmer, Par. and Fam. of Hanmer, 126-31.
- 32. Hanmer, Par. and Fam. of Hanmer, 131.
- 33. HP Commons 1690-1715, ‘Thomas Hanmer II’.