Constituency Dates
Leominster 26 Feb. 1866 – 1868
Family and Education
b. 22 Jan. 1835, 2nd s. of John Arkwright (d. 27 Feb. 1858), of Hampton Court, Herefs., and Sarah, eld. surv. da. of Sir Hungerford Hoskyns, 7th bt., of Harewood, Herefs. educ. Harrow 1848-53; Trinity, Camb. adm. pens. 24 June 1853, matric. Michs. 1853, BA 1857, MA 1860. L. Inn adm. 2 Dec. 1853, called 17 Nov. 1859. m. 22 July 1862, Mary, da. of George Stevens Byng MP, 2nd earl of Strafford. d. s.p. 14 Nov. 1918.
Offices Held

Deputy lt. Herefs.

Address
Main residence: Hampton Court, Hope under Dinmore, Herefordshire.
biography text

A descendant of the famous inventor Sir Richard Arkwright (1732-1792), Arkwright was a lawyer who reflected his family’s traditional Tory values in Parliament. Arkwright’s father John, was one of five sons of Richard Arkwright junior, the only son and heir of the immensely wealthy Sir Richard. Richard Arkwright, or ‘Dick’ as he was known in the family, was therefore the great-grandson and namesake of the pioneering capitalist. John and his brothers were set up as country gentlemen by their father, who purchased landed estates on their behalf and settled vast fortunes upon them.1E. L. Jones, ‘Industrial capital and landed investment: the Arkwrights in Herefordshire, 1809-43’, in E. L. Jones and G. E. Mingay eds., Land, labour and population in the Industrial Revolution: essays presented to J. D. Chambers (1967), 48-71. John’s Herefordshire estate, Hampton Court, was near Leominster, a constituency over which the family exercised influence sufficient to return at least one MP after 1841.2N. Gash, Politics in the age of Peel (1949), 199.

Arkwright was groomed for the law and practised as a barrister on the Oxford circuit and a revising barrister for Monmouthshire, Cheltenham and Gloucester prior to his entry into Parliament.3Alumni Cantabrigienses, pt. 2, vol. i, 70. When a vacancy for Leominster arose in 1866, Arkwright was returned unopposed at the nomination, when he argued that the Conservatives provided the only constitutional bulwark against radicalism now that Palmerston had died. Dismissing the need for reform, Arkwright argued that Britain was well-governed and that there were few genuine grievances.4Hereford Journal, 3 Mar. 1866.

His family’s staunch support for the Church of England was reflected in his votes against the abolition of church rates and Anglican tests at Oxford University, 7, 21 Mar. 1866. In his maiden speech, 14 May 1866, he defended his constituency’s right to return two MPs, which was threatened by the Liberal government’s reform bill. Asking a series of rhetorical questions, each beginning ‘I will not ask why’, Arkwright highlighted inconsistencies in the government’s treatment of small boroughs, which were as ‘illogical and tyrannical an injustice as has ever been contemplated by any government’. (The government proposed partially disenfranchising all boroughs with a population under 8,000 which disproportionately affected Conservative seats, rather than 10,000 which would have had a more equal impact on both parties). He voted with the Conservatives and Adullamites in favour of Earl Grosvenor’s amendment for a parallel redistribution scheme and Lord Dunkellin’s proposal for a rateable rather than a rental franchise, 27 Apr., 18 June 1866.

In the divisions on the Derby government’s representation of the people bill the following year, Arkwright generally voted with the majority of Conservative MPs, dividing against enfranchising compounders and lodgers and expanding the copyhold franchise. He also opposed increasing the representation of the largest towns at the expense of the small boroughs and supported attempts to safeguard minorities, dividing in favour of Lowe’s amendment to introduce cumulative voting, and the minority clause, 5 July, 8 Aug. 1867. In the same session Arkwright briefly intervened to speak as a member of the select committee on the county Waterford election, in order to correct erroneous comments made by other MPs. He stated that no evidence had been presented of undue influence from landlords that would have justified any violence, 25 July 1867.

After opposing Gladstone’s Irish church resolutions, 3 Apr. 1868, Arkwright was re-elected at the general election later that year and continued to represent Leominster until 1875, when he took the Chiltern Hundreds. In 1887 a special Act of Parliament made Arkwright a trustee of the Hampton Court estate owned by his inept elder brother John Hungerford Arkwright. Cleverer and possessing a cool legal mind, Arkwright was in effect appointed to oversee his brother’s management of the estate. The situation was humiliating for John Hungerford Arkwright and placed a strain on their fraternal relations. The estate was eventually sold off in the early twentieth century. A clever man who possessed a cool legal mind, Richard Arkwright later became a heavy drinker.5C. Beale, Champagne and shambles: the Arkwrights and the downfall of the landed aristocracy (2006), 155. He died without issue in 1918, and left a personal estate sworn under £9,884.6National Probate Calendar, 4 Feb. 1919.

Author
Notes
  • 1. E. L. Jones, ‘Industrial capital and landed investment: the Arkwrights in Herefordshire, 1809-43’, in E. L. Jones and G. E. Mingay eds., Land, labour and population in the Industrial Revolution: essays presented to J. D. Chambers (1967), 48-71.
  • 2. N. Gash, Politics in the age of Peel (1949), 199.
  • 3. Alumni Cantabrigienses, pt. 2, vol. i, 70.
  • 4. Hereford Journal, 3 Mar. 1866.
  • 5. C. Beale, Champagne and shambles: the Arkwrights and the downfall of the landed aristocracy (2006), 155.
  • 6. National Probate Calendar, 4 Feb. 1919.