Right of election

in the ‘mayor and burgesses’

Background Information

Number of voters: unknown

Constituency business
County
Date Candidate Votes
Mar. 1604 SIR JAMES LEY
MATTHEW LEY
17 Oct. 1605 ALEXANDER CHOCKE I vice Ley, appointed to office
18 Sept. 1609 SIR JAMES LEY vice Chocke, deceased
c Mar. 1614 HENRY LEY
MATTHEW LEY
2 Jan. 1621 SIR JAMES LEY
SIR MILES FLEETWOOD
1 Mar. 1621 WALTER LONG I vice Ley, called to the Upper House as a legal assistant
3 Feb. 1624 SIR HENRY LEY
SIR HENRY MILDMAY
6 May 1625 WALTER LONG I
GIFFORD LONG
6 Jan. 1626 THOMAS HOPTON
WALTER LONG I
4 Mar. 1628 MAXIMILIAN PETTY
CHARLES THYNNE
Main Article

Westbury was a small market town in the centre of Wiltshire’s clothing area. The borough, apparently restricted to the precinct in which the ancient burgage tenements lay, was never chartered, but a municipal structure had evolved by the reign of Elizabeth, which included a mayor and a town seal. Enfranchised from 1448, the parliamentary indentures for the early Stuart period were signed by the ‘mayor and burgesses’ and authenticated with the town seal; the 1625 indenture was additionally witnessed by ‘Edward Greenhill, Thomas Style, John Greenhill and others’. At its dissolution in 1835 the corporation consisted of a mayor, recorder, and 13 capital burgesses, but it is impossible to say how far this structure had developed two centuries earlier.1VCH Wilts. viii. 186; C219/39/230.

The most influential local landowner at Westbury was Sir James Ley, whose father had acquired the nearby manor of Teffont Evias. From 1599 Ley began to purchase property in Westbury, which ultimately gave him a preponderant interest in the parliamentary elections there.2 VCH Wilts. viii. 149-51, 155, 157-8, 161-2. During the early Stuart period four of the borough’s MPs were his relatives: his brother Matthew, son Henry, brother-in-law Maximilian Petty, and son-in-law Walter Long I. Sir Miles Fleetwood, returned in 1621, was professionally connected with Ley, being receiver-general of the Court of Wards, of which Ley was then attorney.

Though their election presumably needed Ley’s approbation, other Members had independent influence as local landowners. The family of Alexander Chocke I, who was returned at Westbury after Ley was appointed chief justice of Ireland, had long owned property in the area.3 CJ, i. 323b; Bowyer Diary, 188. On the day after his election, Chocke was invested with the manor of Westbury St. Maur.4 VCH Wilts. viii. 150; C142/211/186; R.C. Hoare, Hist. Wilts. ‘Westbury Hundred’, 39. Gifford Long, whose maternal grandfather and great-uncle had represented the borough in the previous reign, inherited property in Westbury, of which at least one manor – Westbury Stourton – was sold to Ley;5 VCH Wilts. viii. 150. and Thomas Hopton’s brothers had recently acquired an interest in Westbury rectory.6 C3/358/7. Charles Thynne is the only Member who had no known connection with Ley or the borough. He probably relied for his seat upon his half-brother (Sir) Thomas Thynne*, whose estate at nearby Longleat presumably gave him some influence with Ley.

Author
Notes
  • 1. VCH Wilts. viii. 186; C219/39/230.
  • 2. VCH Wilts. viii. 149-51, 155, 157-8, 161-2.
  • 3. CJ, i. 323b; Bowyer Diary, 188.
  • 4. VCH Wilts. viii. 150; C142/211/186; R.C. Hoare, Hist. Wilts. ‘Westbury Hundred’, 39.
  • 5. VCH Wilts. viii. 150.
  • 6. C3/358/7.