Right of election

in inhabitant householders

Background Information

Number of voters: about 200

Number of seats
2
Constituency business
County
Date Candidate Votes
15 Apr. 1754 THOMAS LOCKYER
JOHN TALBOT
29 Dec. 1755 TALBOT re-elected after appointment to office
8 Dec. 1756 JOSEPH TOLSON LOCKYER vice Talbot, deceased
27 Mar. 1761 JOSEPH TOLSON LOCKYER
111
JOHN PERCEVAL, Earl of Egmont
100
Richard Combe
55
4 Dec. 1761 WILLIAM WILSON vice Egmont, chose to sit for Bridgwater
26 Apr. 1765 PETER LEGH vice Lockyer, deceased
89
John Kennion
51
16 Mar. 1768 PETER LEGH
BROWNLOW CUST
8 Oct. 1774 PEREGRINE CUST
103
WILLIAM INNES
102
Richard Brown
53
Inigo William Jones
53
14 Dec. 1775 NATHANIEL WEBB
OWEN SALUSBURY BRERETON
Richard Brown
Inigo William Jones
7 Sept. 1780 PEREGRINE CUST
SAMUEL SMITH
2 Apr. 1784 PEREGRINE CUST
95
BENJAMIN BOND HOPKINS
89
John Harcourt
70
Sir Samuel Hannay
59
8 Feb. 1785 JOHN HARCOURT vice Cust, deceased
118
George Johnstone
101
Johnstone vice Harcourt, on petition, 22 Feb. 1786
24 Feb. 1787 GEORGE SUMNER vice Johnstone, vacated his seat
Main Article

Ilchester was a venal borough, with an electorate described by Francis Fane in 1756 as ‘poor and corrupt, without honour, morals, or attachment to any man or party’.1Add. 32867, f. 474. The election of 1774 was declared void because of bribery, and John Harcourt was unseated in 1786 because of ‘gross and illegal’ malpractices by the returning officer. For most of this period its patron was Thomas Lockyer, but by 1774 his hold on the borough seems to have become less complete. John Robinson wrote in his survey for the general election of 1784:2Laprade, 75. ‘This borough is open, but notwithstanding the weight of interest is with the old Members’, i.e. the Lockyer candidates, who were in fact returned.

Lockyer died on 9 July 1785, and in his will instructed his executors to sell his property and invest the proceeds in Government stock. But it seems that Samuel Smith, his son-in-law, had succeeded to a good deal of Lockyer’s influence in the borough. There was also a rival interest managed by John Harcourt on behalf of Richard Troward, a London attorney, who had purchased property in Ilchester. At the by-election of 1785 Smith secured the return of his candidate, George Johnstone, on petition; and when Johnstone retired from Parliament, offered the seat to a friend of Lord Hawkesbury.3Add. 38220, f. 252. Towards the end of this period the situation at Ilchester became very confused, and it is not at all clear who had the chief interest in the borough.

Author
Notes
  • 1. Add. 32867, f. 474.
  • 2. Laprade, 75.
  • 3. Add. 38220, f. 252.