Right of election

in the freemen

Background Information

Number of voters: about 300

Number of seats
2
Constituency business
County
Date Candidate Votes
19 Apr. 1754 SIR JOHN TURNER
HORATIO WALPOLE
24 Feb. 1757 HORATIO WALPOLE vice Horatio Walpole, called to the Upper House
27 Mar. 1761 SIR JOHN TURNER
HORATIO WALPOLE
9 June 1762 TURNER re-elected after appointment to office
21 Mar. 1768 THOMAS WALPOLE
200
SIR JOHN TURNER
174
Crisp Molineux
159
8 Oct. 1774 THOMAS WALPOLE
CRISP MOLINEUX
11 Sept. 1780 THOMAS WALPOLE
CRISP MOLINEUX
2 Apr. 1784 HORATIO WALPOLE
151
CRISP MOLINEUX
136
Brigg Price Fountaine
72
Main Article

From 1754 to 1774 one seat at King’s Lynn was held by Sir John Turner and the other by a member of the Walpole family. In 1765 Turner quarrelled with one of his principal supporters, and an opposition developed against him which soon assumed a political character. Turner, who had held office under the Grenville Administration, remained with Grenville in opposition; his opponent, Crisp Molineux, was a friend of Wilkes and admirer of Chatham; while the Walpoles preserved their neutrality. General warrants was an important issue in the contest, but Turner’s victory was more a matter of electoral mechanics. Turner and Molineux had agreed to ask for one vote for themselves and one for Thomas Walpole, and when Turner began to ask for single votes only, Walpole’s position was in danger. He was saved because Molineux honoured the agreement; had Molineux, like Turner, asked for single votes only, he would have been head of the poll and Walpole at the bottom.

Molineux was promised the first vacant seat at a Walpole borough, but he continued to cultivate his interest at King’s Lynn in association with the Walpoles. It was a sign of his influence in the borough that in 1770 he persuaded the corporation to confer the freedom on Wilkes. In 1774 and 1780 Molineux and Thomas Walpole were returned unopposed, and the contest of 1784 demonstrated the strength of their interests.

Constituency Title Notes

B. D. Hayes, ‘Politics in Norfolk, 1750-1832’, Cambridge Univ. Ph.D. thesis.

Author