Right of election

in the corporation

Background Information

Number of voters: 24

Number of seats
2
Constituency business
County
Date Candidate Votes
8 Apr. 1754 THOMAS LEE DUMMER
RALPH JENISON
1 June 1758 CHARLES HOLMES vice Jenison, deceased
30 Mar. 1761 THOMAS LEE DUMMER
CHARLES HOLMES
7 Apr. 1762 WILLIAM RAWLINSON EARLE vice Holmes, deceased
26 Dec. 1765 THOMAS DUMMER vice Thomas Lee Dummer, deceased
21 Mar. 1768 JOHN EAMES
16
HANS SLOANE
16
Sir Thomas Worsley
6
Sir William Oglander
6
14 Apr. 1773 JOHN ST. JOHN vice Eames, appointed to office
7 Oct. 1774 SIR RICHARD WORSLEY
HANS SLOANE
17 Dec. 1777 WORSLEY re-elected after appointment to office
1 Feb. 1780 WORSLEY re-elected after appointment to office
11 Sept. 1780 SIR RICHARD WORSLEY
JOHN ST. JOHN
2 Apr. 1784 EDWARD RUSHWORTH
15
HUGH SEYMOUR CONWAY
13
John Barrington
3
10 Apr. 1786 JOHN THOMAS TOWNSHEND vice Seymour Conway, vacated his seat
28 Jan. 1790 GEORGE BYNG vice Townshend, appointed to office
Main Article

During the early part of this period Newport was controlled by Thomas Holmes and its Members were invariably recommended by Administration. On Holmes’s death in 1764, his place was taken by his nephew and heir, the Rev. Leonard Troughear Holmes, who continued to work with successive Administrations in co-operation with the new governor of the Isle of Wight, Hans Stanley. But their interest came under attack in all three Isle of Wight boroughs from a party led by Jervoise Clarke Jervoise, Sir Thomas Worsley, and Sir William Oglander; and at Newport they were particularly vulnerable. ‘I find there is a complaint’, wrote Stanley to Grenville on 9 Dec. 1764, ‘that my Lord Holmes and his friends carried matters too imperiously.’1Grenville mss (JM). He therefore assured Oglander and Worsley that he meant to use his influence at Newport ‘without partiality or oppression’ in favour of all who were disposed to be his friends; but refused their request that the vacancies in the corporation should be filled ‘with two of each party’, which would perpetuate disputes and leave the corporation in a precarious state. ‘Though it is impossible to hold an exact balance here’, he wrote, ‘... I have endeavoured not to disgust the other party’; and he likewise advised Holmes ‘to follow more conciliating measures’ and found him inclined to them.

Nevertheless at the general election of 1768 the Holmes-Stanley group were attacked at Yarmouth by Jervoise Clarke and at Newport by Worsley and Oglander. At Newport Holmes and Stanley were successful, and Holmes retained control of the borough for the remainder of this period.

Author
Notes
  • 1. Grenville mss (JM).