Right of election

in the corporation

Background Information

Number of voters: 13

Constituency business
Date Candidate Votes
24 Jan. 1715 ALEXANDER DENTON
ABRAHAM STANYAN
Thomas Chapman
Nov. 1717 EDMUND HALSEY vice Stanyan, appointed to office
23 Mar. 1722 ALEXANDER DENTON
RICHARD GRENVILLE
22 Oct. 1722 WILLIAM HEATHCOTE vice Denton, appointed to office
1 Mar. 1727 JOHN FANE vice Grenville, deceased
18 Aug. 1727 JOHN FANE
THOMAS LEWIS
20 Feb. 1728 GEORGE CHAMBERLAYNE vice Lewis, chose to sit for Salisbury
23 Apr. 1734 RICHARD GRENVILLE
GEORGE CHAMBERLAYNE
4 May 1741 GEORGE DENTON
GEORGE GRENVILLE
28 Dec. 1744 GEORGE GRENVILLE re-elected after appointment to office
26 June 1747 RICHARD GRENVILLE
GEORGE GRENVILLE
17 Jan. 1753 TEMPLE WEST vice Richard Grenville, Visct. Cobham, called to the Upper House
Main Article

Both Buckingham seats were controlled by the local Whig families of Temple, afterwards Grenville, of Stowe, and Denton of Hillesden. The Temples were the lords paramount of the borough, receiving a quit-rent from the corporation; the Dentons held the Prebend End manor within the town.1VCH Bucks. iii. 481, 483. After 1715, when a Tory single was defeated, there were no contested elections. At first the Dentons followed the political lead of the Grenvilles, but when the latter went over to the Government in 1744, George Denton apparently remained in opposition, breaking with the Grenvilles, who took both seats at the 1747 election. The 2nd Lord Egmont wrote against Buckingham in his electoral survey, c.1749—50: ‘The Grenvilles must be routed at all events and two friends brought in’, the Prince of Wales adding

which may be done by the Apothecary [Bubb Dodington], who detests them, and by Mr. Denton, who probably would be one, the other might be a rich man, who would launch out a sum. Potter and Ayscough know that borough.

Author
Notes
  • 1. VCH Bucks. iii. 481, 483.