Right of election

in the freemen

Background Information

Number of voters: 851Add. 5841, f. 143.

Constituency business
County
Date Candidate Votes
29 Jan. 1715 LORD WILLIAM POWLETT
GEORGE BRYDGES
John Popham
17 Nov. 1715 POWLETT re-elected after appointment to office
20 Mar. 1722 LORD WILLIAM POWLETT
GEORGE BRYDGES
18 Aug. 1727 LORD WILLIAM POWLETT
GEORGE BRYDGES
26 Jan. 1730 NORTON POWLETT vice Lord William Powlett, deceased
46
Paulet St. John
40
27 Apr. 1734 PAULET ST. JOHN
GEORGE BRYDGES
William Powlett
8 May 1741 GEORGE BRYDGES
WILLIAM POWLETT
2 July 1747 GEORGE BRYDGES
50
HENRY PENTON
37
William Powlett
27
28 May 1751 PAULET ST. JOHN vice Brydges, deceased
William Powlett
Main Article

Till 1734 the Winchester corporation returned the relations of Charles Powlett, 3rd Duke of Bolton, the lord lieutenant of the county, and George Brydges, a neighbouring landowner, related to the 1st Duke of Chandos. An undated letter shows the two dukes, on behalf of Brydges, representing to Walpole that it was of consequence to the interest at Winchester that a patent applied for by the corporation should be passed immediately.2Cholmondeley (Houghton) mss 3264.

In 1734, when the Duke of Bolton had gone into opposition, Brydges joined with Paulet St. John, another neighbouring landowner, who had stood unsuccessfully at a by-election in 1730, to defeat the Duke’s cousin, William Powlett.3Chandos to Pescod, 29 Apr. 1734, Chandos letter bks. At the next general election St. John was returned for the county, leaving Brydges and William Powlett unopposed at Winchester. From 1747 Henry Penton, a native of the city, gained control of the second seat, ousting William Powlett. In 1751, on the death of Brydges, whose estates passed to Henry Brydges, 2nd Duke of Chandos, the resulting vacancy was filled by St. John.

Author
Notes
  • 1. Add. 5841, f. 143.
  • 2. Cholmondeley (Houghton) mss 3264.
  • 3. Chandos to Pescod, 29 Apr. 1734, Chandos letter bks.