Right of election

in the freemen

Background Information

Number of voters: about 1400

Constituency business
County
Date Candidate Votes
3 Feb. 1715 THOMAS FOLEY
787
JAMES SCUDAMORE, Visct. Scudamore
777
Herbert Rudhale Westfaling
575
Nicholas Philpott
550
12 Mar. 1717 HERBERT RUDHALE WESTFALING vice Scudamore, deceased
634
Timothy Geers
421
27 Mar. 1722 HERBERT RUDHALE WESTFALING
WILLIAM MAYO
2 Apr. 1723 JAMES WALWYN vice Mayo, deceased
majority c.400
John Price
22 Aug. 1727 HENRY BRYDGES, Mq. of Carnarvon
THOMAS GEERS
John Kyrwood
1 May 1734 THOMAS FOLEY
693
SIR JOHN MORGAN
555
Herbert Rudhale Westfaling Jun.
522
11 May 1741 EDWARD COPE HOPTON
506
THOMAS GEERS WINFORD
504
Herbert Rudhale Westfaling Jun.
479
Henry Cornewall
420
William Brydges
25
3 July 1747 HENRY CORNEWALL
742
DANIEL LEIGHTON
451
Herbert Rudhale Westfaling
337
Main Article

Hereford was an independent borough, usually represented by local country gentlemen. Owing to the size of the electorate the borough was regarded by the Duke of Chandos as ‘extravagantly expensive’. In 1727 he reckoned that it would be necessary to pay at least 500 voters 5 or 6 guineas a head to secure the return of his candidates.1Chandos to Capt. Oakeley, 12 July 1727, to H. R. Westfaling, 8 Aug. 1727, Chandos letter bks.

After George I’s accession Chandos, then Lord Carnarvon, who as James Brydges had shared the representation with Thomas Foley, a Tory, in the previous reign, proposed a renewal of the compromise, recommending his cousin, Nicholas Philpott, as his successor. The Tories, however, put up a second candidate, who with Foley defeated Philpott and another of Chandos’s cousins, Herbert Rudhale Westfaling.2Brydges to Thos. Foley, 16 Sept.,to mayor and corporation of Hereford, 18 Oct., Carnarvon to Westfaling and Ld. Coningsby, 31 Dec. 1714, ibid.

In 1722 Chandos arranged a compromise between Foley’s son and Westfaling. This attempt to dispose of the seat antagonized the local gentry, who put up William Mayo, a Whig, ‘under pretence of opposing Africanus’,3Chandos to Major Crosbie, 22 Dec. 1721, ibid; HMC Portland, vii. 318-19. i.e. Chandos, a director of the Royal African Company. In Foley’s words:

My election was thought to be out of danger, and had been so had not some gentlemen, who professed themselves my friends and appeared with me at first, thought fit to set up a third man in opposition (as they pretend) to Mr. Westfaling, but the storm must necessarily fall upon me, at least a great many ill-consequences.417 Mar. 1722, Portland mss.

Foley withdrew before the poll, leaving Westfaling and Mayo to be returned unopposed.

In 1727 both sides agreed to a compromise under which Chandos’s son, Lord Carnarvon, and a local Tory, Thomas Geers, were returned, despite the last minute intervention of an independent candidate. In 1734, Chandos’s interest having ‘quite gone’,5Chandos to Sir R. Walpole, 19 Aug. 1727, to Westfaling, 27 Oct. 1733, Chandos letter bks. the Tories won both seats as they did again in 1741; but in 1747, when they appear to have been unable to find a local candidate,6Duncombe, Herefs. iii. 169. the borough returned Henry Cornewall, a government supporter, and Daniel Leighton, a Leicester House Whig.

Author
Notes
  • 1. Chandos to Capt. Oakeley, 12 July 1727, to H. R. Westfaling, 8 Aug. 1727, Chandos letter bks.
  • 2. Brydges to Thos. Foley, 16 Sept.,to mayor and corporation of Hereford, 18 Oct., Carnarvon to Westfaling and Ld. Coningsby, 31 Dec. 1714, ibid.
  • 3. Chandos to Major Crosbie, 22 Dec. 1721, ibid; HMC Portland, vii. 318-19.
  • 4. 17 Mar. 1722, Portland mss.
  • 5. Chandos to Sir R. Walpole, 19 Aug. 1727, to Westfaling, 27 Oct. 1733, Chandos letter bks.
  • 6. Duncombe, Herefs. iii. 169.