Kent

<p>The selection of candidates for Kent county elections was governed by a convention that one of them should be an East Kent and the other a West Kent man. The chief Whig families were the Sackvilles of Knole, dukes of Dorset, and the Fanes of Mereworth, earls of Westmorland. The Government had an interest based on the Chatham docks and the Cinque Ports.</p><p>In 1715 Lord Westmorland succeeded in securing the adoption of his brother, Mildmay Fane, by persuading a rival Whig candidate, <a href="/landingpage/58698" title="David Polhill" class="link">David Polhill</a>, to accept the office of sheriff, which disqualified him from standing. Fane and another Whig defeated the retiring Tory Members, Sir Edward Knatchbull and Percival Hart, by majorities of less than 200. On Mildmay Fane’s death later that year he was succeeded by his brother, John Fane, without opposition.</p><p>In 1722 Polhill, a West Kent Whig, stood with <a href="/landingpage/58606" title="Sir George Oxenden" class="link">Sir George Oxenden</a>, an East Kent man, but the Whig interest was split by Fane, who insisted on standing, with the support of the Duke of Dorset. In the end all three Whig candidates withdrew, leaving Knatchbull and another Tory, Sir Thomas Twisden, to be returned unopposed.<a class='fnlink' id='t1' href='#fn1'>1<span>Memo. by C. Polhill, 10 Nov. 1770, Polhill mss, Sevenoaks Pub. Lib. Kent.</span></a></p><p>In 1727 the Whigs, strengthened by Knatchbull’s defection, won both seats by increased majorities. At the next general election their candidates were Oxenden and Lord Middlesex, whose father, the Duke of Dorset, then lord lieutenant of Ireland, had persuaded Fane, now Lord Catherlough, not to stand, on a promise to bring him in for Sandwich. The Whig campaign was handicapped by Oxenden’s suspicion that the Duke’s agents were making interest for Middlesex singly, instead of jointly for both; by Middlesex’s prolonged absence in Ireland with his father; and by Oxenden’s having voted for the excise bill.<a class='fnlink' id='t2' href='#fn2'>2<span><em>HMC Stopford-Sackville</em>, i. 153.</span></a> Moreover, Walpole,</p><blockquote><p>having a pique at Lord Carlow [phonetic for Catherlough] for his behaviour in Parliament last session, wrote over to the Duke of Dorset when in Ireland that he should not support Lord Carlow but <a href="/landingpage/57436" title="Mr. Burchett" class="link">Mr. Burchett</a>, and upon receipt of the letter the Duke served Mr. Burchett,<a class='fnlink' id='t3' href='#fn3'>3<span><em>HMC Egmont Diary</em>, ii. 109.</span></a></p></blockquote><p>leaving Catherlough without a seat. On 11 May, four days before polling day for the county, Lord Hervey wrote to <a href="/landingpage/57900" title="Henry Fox" class="link">Henry Fox</a>:</p><blockquote><p>There is a thousand embarras and tracasseries about the Kentish election. Lord Catherlough, who has acted very oddly in several things this year, is playing the devil there, roaring against the Duke of Dorset, and does all he can against Lord Middlesex.<a class='fnlink' id='t4' href='#fn4'>4<span>Ilchester, <em>Lord Hervey and his Friends</em>, 198.</span></a></p></blockquote><p>As a result Middlesex and Oxenden were defeated by Sir Edward Dering, a Tory, standing jointly with Lord Vane, an opposition Whig. At both the next two general elections Tories were returned unopposed, an attempt in 1747 to put up <a href="/landingpage/58807" title="Lord George Sackville" class="link">Lord George Sackville</a> and Oxenden failing because the Duke of Dorset objected to his son’s joining with Oxenden, with whom the Sackvilles had fallen out during the 1734 campaign.<a class='fnlink' id='t5' href='#fn5'>5<span>C. Polhill to &amp;mdash; Hughes, 24 July 1747, Polhill mss.</span></a></p>