Right of election

in the freemen and freeholders

Background Information

Number of voters: about 3300

Constituency business
County
Date Candidate Votes
2 Feb. 1715 WALLER BACON
1,662
ROBERT BRITIFFE
1,652
Robert Bene
1,326
Richard Berney
1,319
3 Apr. 1722 WALLER BACON
ROBERT BRITIFFE
30 Aug. 1727 ROBERT BRITIFFE
1,626
WALLER BACON
1,542
Miles Branthwayt
1,265
Richard Berney
1,188
15 May 1734 HORATIO WALPOLE
1,785
WALLER BACON
1,749
Sir Edward Ward
1,621
Miles Branthwayt
1,567
19 Feb. 1735 THOMAS VERE vice Bacon, deceased
1,820
Miles Branthwayt
1,486
6 May 1741 HORATIO WALPOLE
1,771
THOMAS VERE
1,621
William Clarke
829
29 June 1747 JOHN HOBART, Lord Hobart
HORATIO WALPOLE
Main Article

Norwich, which claimed to be the second city in the kingdom, was governed by the mayor, sheriffs, citizens, and commonalty in common council assembled, consisting of twenty-four aldermen, sitting for life, and sixty common councillors, elected annually by the resident freemen. There was also a court of mayoralty, made up of the mayor, sheriffs, and aldermen, sitting by themselves and combining legislative, executive, and judicial functions. The court of mayoralty or, as it was sometimes called, of aldermen, was Whig and the common council Tory at George I’s accession.

In 1715 the late Tory Members were defeated by two Whigs, Robert Britiffe, a Norwich lawyer, employed by Walpole, and Waller Bacon, a local landowner. They were re-elected unopposed in 1722, when a rival Whig candidate withdrew,

the principal persons he depended upon amongst the Dissenters having now openly declared that, seeing the aim is only to break our interest, they will act against him.1John Clarke to Sunderland, 17 Feb. 1721, Sunderland (Blenheim) mss.

Before the municipal elections later in that year a local Whig leader wrote that if they did not go well

it will give such a turn to the constitution as will not be easily helped without taking away the charter and granting it on another foot, viz. by confirming the present court of aldermen, who have a majority firmly in the interest of the present Government, and granting to them a power to choose sixty common councillors, who shall remain so for life, and that for the future the mayor and sheriffs shall be annually chosen by a majority of the said court of aldermen and common council.2S. & B. Webb, Eng. Local Govt. iii. 545-6.

In 1727 Britiffe and Bacon were again returned after a riotous contest, in which Richard Berney, a former Tory Member, was thought to have behaved badly by standing against them, ‘for he had lately been made recorder of this city, and principally by their interest’.3VCH Norf. ii. 520. In 1730 the disputes between the Whig aldermen were composed by a local Act putting the municipal constitution on a bicameral basis. In 1733 Walpole visited Norwich to induct his brother, Horace, as prospective candidate for the city, where he was fêted by the corporation, who presented him with a gold box. He was present at Norwich on the election day, at the end of which he was able to report to Newcastle that both Whig candidates had been successful:

Great expenses made, great threats ushered in the day, but a due provision to repel force by force made it a quiet election.;4J. H. Plumb, Walpole, ii. 283, 321.

After Waller Bacon’s death in 1735, his son, who had been passed over for the vacancy in favour of Thomas Vere, a local merchant, threatened to divide the Whig interest by standing with Tory support at the next general election,5J. Fowle to ‘old’ Horace Walpole, 4 Nov. 1739, Walpole (Wolterton) mss. but was bought off by being returned elsewhere on the Walpole interest. The situation was repeated in 1747, this time by the Earl of Buckinghamshire, formerly Sir John Hobart who succeeded in forcing a compromise under which his son, Lord Hobart, was returned unopposed with old Horace Walpole, Vere being dropped.6Pelham to same, 24 June, 4 July 1747, Add. 9186, ff.101, 105.

Author
Notes
  • 1. John Clarke to Sunderland, 17 Feb. 1721, Sunderland (Blenheim) mss.
  • 2. S. & B. Webb, Eng. Local Govt. iii. 545-6.
  • 3. VCH Norf. ii. 520.
  • 4. J. H. Plumb, Walpole, ii. 283, 321.
  • 5. J. Fowle to ‘old’ Horace Walpole, 4 Nov. 1739, Walpole (Wolterton) mss.
  • 6. Pelham to same, 24 June, 4 July 1747, Add. 9186, ff.101, 105.