Right of election

’in the bailiffs, magistrates, free-holders of forty shillings per annum, and all that hold by burgage tenure, and in such freemen only of the said city as are enrolled, paying scot and lot there’

Background Information

Number of voters: about 600

Constituency business
County
Date Candidate Votes
10 Feb. 1715 WALTER CHETWYND
285
SAMUEL HILL
275
Richard Dyott
195
John Cotes
192
24 Apr. 1718 WILLIAM SNEYD vice Chetwynd, appointed to office
255
Walter Chetwynd
254
CHETWYND vice Sneyd, on petition, 10 Dec. 1718
20 Mar. 1722 WALTER CHETWYND
RICHARD PLUMER
Thomas Clark
17 Aug. 1727 WALTER CHETWYND
RICHARD PLUMER
Sir John Statham
Thomas Bagshaw
20 May 1731 GEORGE VENABLES VERNON vice Chetwynd, appointed to office
16 May 1734 SIR ROWLAND HILL
GEORGE VENABLES VERNON
14 May 1741 GEORGE VENABLES VERNON
SIR LISTER HOLTE
2 July 1747 RICHARD LEVESON GOWER
278
THOMAS ANSON
272
Sir Lister Holte
237
George Venables Vernon
229
24 Nov. 1753 SIR THOMAS GRESLEY vice Leveson Gower, deceased
348
Henry Vernon
261
VERNON vice Gresley, on petition, 29 Jan. 1754
Main Article

There was no predominant influence at Lichfield. Contests were frequent and sometimes turbulent owing to a strong and aggressive Jacobite element in the town. In 1715 Chetwynd, a Whig, and Hill, a moderate Tory, defeated two high Tories. At a by-election caused by Chetwynd’s appointment to office in 1718, a Tory was successful, Chetwynd’s supporters being ‘kept out of the Hall and barbarously beaten and abused, and their lives endangered by a very great mob with papers in their hats resembling white roses’, the Pretender’s emblem.1Keatt’s Weekly Jnl. 3 May 1718. Chetwynd was subsequently unseated on petition. In 1722, a Tory reported:

there will be a right majority at Lichfield but the returning officer, who was always thought a Tory and an honest man, has been bought and will certainly return the others.2HMC Portland, vii. 318.

Two Whigs were returned. In 1727 the Whig Members were again returned, according to their opponents’ petition by paying the corporation £800, and by threatening the tenants of the dean and chapter with eviction and even ‘with ecclesiastical censure for incontinency’ if they did not support them.3CJ, xxi. 46. At a by-election in 1731, however, a Tory was returned, William Chetwynd, the brother of the previous Member, desisting when he found the returning officer entirely in his opponent’s interests.4Read’s Weekly Jnl. 1 May 1731. In 1734 and 1741 two Tories were unopposed. But in 1747 Lord Anson, who had been laying out part of his prize money on buying up freeholds and burgages at Lichfield,5Staffs. Parl. Hist. (Wm. Salt Arch. Soc.), ii (2), pp. 265-6. joined interests with Lord Gower, the former Tory leader, who had recently gone over to the Government. After a bitter contest at which ‘the whole Jacobite party made their push to sacrifice Lord Gower for having quitted his party’, Anson’s brother, Thomas, and a son of Lord Gower were successful at a cost of £20,000.6Ld. Anson to Sir Peter Warren, 23 July 1747, Lichfield mss.

At a by-election in 1753, the Tory candidate,

Sir Thomas Gresley Bt., entered the city attended by upwards of 200 gentlemen and 500 freemen. The ribbons worn on this occasion were blue [Tory] and white [Pretender], with the mottoes of ‘No Jews’ [against the bill for the naturalization of the Jews], ‘No venality and corruption’, ‘Christianity and the English constitution for ever’.7Staffs. Parl. Hist. ii (2), 254.

He was successful, only to be unseated on petition.

Author
Notes
  • 1. Keatt’s Weekly Jnl. 3 May 1718.
  • 2. HMC Portland, vii. 318.
  • 3. CJ, xxi. 46.
  • 4. Read’s Weekly Jnl. 1 May 1731.
  • 5. Staffs. Parl. Hist. (Wm. Salt Arch. Soc.), ii (2), pp. 265-6.
  • 6. Ld. Anson to Sir Peter Warren, 23 July 1747, Lichfield mss.
  • 7. Staffs. Parl. Hist. ii (2), 254.