Midhurst

In 1715 the chief interest at Midhurst was in the Viscounts Montagu, the lords of the manor, Roman Catholics, who at this time took no active part in elections. The borough was controlled by the Duke of Somerset, and, successively, by William Woodward and Bulstrode Peachey, who both took the name of Knight on their marriage to Elizabeth Knight, an heiress owning the neighbouring manor of West Dean. The Duke and Bulstrode Peachey each purchased burgages from the 6th Viscount Montagu, undertaking ‘to assist each other’s interest upon all occasions should either be attacked’1A. A. Dibben, Cowdray Archives, i. p. xxii; Somerset to Duke of Richmond, 25 Nov. 1734, Richmond mss. Elizabeth Knight died in 1738, leaving her estates to Thomas May, who exchanged West Dean for two Hampshire manors belonging to the Peacheys, a transaction ratified by an Act of Parliament in 1745.2VCH Hants, ii. 513-14; iv. 424. The Peacheys, opposition Whigs, continued to share control with the Duke of Somerset, also in opposition, till his death in 1748, when Lord Montagu, encouraged by Henry Pelham,3Montagu to Newcastle, 6 July 1760, Add. 32908, f. 112. decided to reassert his interest. He reckoned this at 145 burgages, including those of 41 independent supporters, compared with Sir John Peachey’s 40 and Sir Thomas Bootle’s 17, bequeathed to him by the Duke of Somerset, with 15 independents in their interest. He undertook to Newcastle that,

whatever two persons you are pleased to name, excepting the Peacheys, they shall have my interest at Midhurst.4Montagu to Newcastle, 15 Jan. 1752, Add. 32726, ff. 48, 50; PCC 379 Strahan.

On Bootle’s death Montagu replaced him by John Sargent, recommended by Pelham.5Sir John Peachey to Newcastle, 28 June 1754, Add. 32735, f. 593.