Right of election

in burgage holders

Background Information

Number of voters: about 200

Constituency business
County
Date Candidate Votes
3 July 1790 JOHN ANSTRUTHER
JOHN BAYNES GARFORTH
5 Aug. 1793 ANSTRUTHER re-elected after appointment to office
7 June 1796 JOHN BAYNES GARFORTH
EDWARD BURROW
29 Dec. 1800 WALTER SPENCER STANHOPE vice Burrow, deceased
8 July 1802 ROBERT WARD
JAMES GRAHAM
22 July 1805 GEORGE STEWART, Visct. Garlies, Visct. Garlies, vice Graham, vacated his seat
3 Nov. 1806 JOHN LOWTHER
JAMES GRAHAM
17 Jan. 1807 THOMAS HAMILTON, Lord Binning, Lord Binning, vice Lowther, chose to sit for Cumberland
16 May 1807 JOHN LOWTHER
JAMES GRAHAM
21 July 1807 JOHN OSBORN vice Lowther, chose to sit for Cumberland
11 July 1808 WILLIAM LOWTHER, Visct. Lowther, Visct. Lowther, vice Osborn, vacated his seat
31 Jan. 1810 LOWTHER re-elected after appointment to office
12 Oct. 1812 WILLIAM LOWTHER, Visct. Lowther
JOHN LOWTHER
23 Dec. 1812 AUGUSTUS JOHN FOSTER vice John Lowther, chose to sit for Cumberland
27 Nov. 1813 THOMAS WALLACE vice Visct. Lowther, appointed to office
1 Mar. 1816 JOHN HENRY LOWTHER vice Foster, vacated his seat
6 Feb. 1818 WALLACE re-elected after appointment to office
20 June 1818 JOHN HENRY LOWTHER
23
JOHN BECKETT
22
Sir Frederick Fletcher Vane, Bt.
2
Hon. George Lamb
1
Main Article

Cockermouth remained a pocket borough of the Lowther family until 1832. James, 1st Earl of Lonsdale, usually returned personal adherents, but when Sir William Lowther succeeded to his electoral influence he frequently placed a seat at the disposal first of the Pittites and later of administration. Although the Earl of Egremont, as lord of the manor and a substantial local property owner, was well suited to contest control of the borough, he could not be induced to take an interest in its politics during this period. Nothing came of the report of an attempt to open the borough in December 1812 by Mr (probably Joseph) Hume.1Lonsdale mss, Lonsdale to Visct. Lowther, 12 Dec., Lowther to Lonsdale, 19 Dec. 1812.

The abortive challenge to the Lowther interest at the general election of 1818, inspired by Brougham’s anti-Lowther crusade in Westmorland and engineered by his brother James, gave ample proof of the futility of fighting a popular campaign in a constituency under tight local control. The unsuccessful Whig candidates meant to contest ‘the question of burgage’; and ‘it was their intention to have polled a good many householders that they might, in that view of the right of voting, have also a majority. But ... they could not get householders to poll for them—two at the utmost.’ No petition materialized.2Carlisle mss, Lady to Ld. Morpeth [15 June], Ld. to Lady Morpeth [21 June], Lamb to Morpeth, 22 June, Howard to same, 3 July 1818; Wentworth Woodhouse mun. G1/14.

Author
Notes
  • 1. Lonsdale mss, Lonsdale to Visct. Lowther, 12 Dec., Lowther to Lonsdale, 19 Dec. 1812.
  • 2. Carlisle mss, Lady to Ld. Morpeth [15 June], Ld. to Lady Morpeth [21 June], Lamb to Morpeth, 22 June, Howard to same, 3 July 1818; Wentworth Woodhouse mun. G1/14.