Right of election

in inhabitant householders

Background Information

Number of voters: about 700

Number of seats
2
Constituency business
County
Date Candidate Votes
16 Apr. 1754 HENRY REGINALD COURTENAY
482
GEORGE YONGE
334
John Duke
295
27 Mar. 1761 HENRY REGINALD COURTENAY
JOHN DUKE
22 Nov. 1763 SIR GEORGE YONGE vice Courtenay, deceased
224
Anthony Bacon
120
17 Nov. 1766 YONGE re-elected after appointment to office
17 Mar. 1768 SIR GEORGE YONGE
429
BRASS CROSBY
325
John Duke
130
7 Oct. 1774 SIR GEORGE YONGE
429
LAURENCE COX
305
John Baring
164
8 Sept. 1780 SIR GEORGE YONGE
393
ALEXANDER MACLEOD
259
Laurence Cox
228
5 Apr. 1781 JACOB WILKINSON vice Macleod
233
Alexander Macleod
199
, whose election was declared void
2 Apr. 1782 YONGE re-elected after appointment to office
16 July 1782 YONGE re-elected after appointment to office
30 Dec. 1783 YONGE re-elected after appointment to office
2 Apr. 1784 SIR GEORGE YONGE
350
SIR GEORGE COLLIER
216
John Bailey
137
Main Article

Honiton had a very wide franchise, and was one of the most venal boroughs in the kingdom. The electorate, which included most adult male inhabitants, was poor, unruly, and of low social standing: the poll book of 17631Photostat copy in Guildhall Lib. does not record a single esquire, and few professional men—most of the voters were labourers, artisans, or small shopkeepers. Candidates were sought out, and even advertised for,2Porritt, Unreformed House of Commons, i. 357. and contests were frequent and expensive. Voters banded themselves into groups in order to get better terms: one group in 1774 was led by a cobbler known as ‘the King of New Street’, another in 1780 by a currier.

The strongest interest was that of the Yonge family, residing at Colyton, five miles from the borough, who held one seat with short intervals from 1679 to 1796. Next came the Courtenays, lords of the manor, who appointed the returning officer and owned the two principal inns in the town. Oldfield wrote of Lord Courtenay in 1792 that ‘what interest he has is conferred on Sir George Yonge’.3Boroughs, i. 253. And Yonge said of his connexion with the borough that he had inherited £80,000, his wife brought him a like amount, and Government had paid him £80,000, but Honiton had swallowed it all.4A. Farquharson, Hist. Honiton, 45.

Author
Notes
  • 1. Photostat copy in Guildhall Lib.
  • 2. Porritt, Unreformed House of Commons, i. 357.
  • 3. Boroughs, i. 253.
  • 4. A. Farquharson, Hist. Honiton, 45.