Right of election

in the freemen

Background Information

Number of voters: about 200

Number of seats
2
Constituency business
County
Date Candidate Votes
20 Apr. 1754 WILLIAM WILDMAN BARRINGTON, Visct. Barrington
SAMUEL DICKER
25 Nov. 1755 BARRINGTON re-elected after appointment to office
26 Jan. 1760 GEORGE POCOCK vice Dicker, deceased
28 Mar. 1761 WILLIAM WILDMAN BARRINGTON, Visct. Barrington
GEORGE POCOCK
11 June 1762 BARRINGTON re-elected after appointment to office
26 Dec. 1765 BARRINGTON re-elected after appointment to office
18 Mar. 1768 WILLIAM WILDMAN BARRINGTON, Visct. Barrington
FRANCIS HOLBURNE
27 Feb. 1770 HOLBURNE re-elected after appointment to office
10 Aug. 1771 SIR CHARLES HARDY vice Holburne, deceased
7 Oct. 1774 WILLIAM WILDMAN BARRINGTON, Visct. Barrington
SIR CHARLES HARDY
5 June 1778 GEORGE LEGGE, Visct. Lewisham, vice Barrington, vacated his seat
31 May 1780 SIR FREDERICK LEMAN ROGERS vice Hardy, deceased
John Culme
12 Sept. 1780 SIR FREDERICK LEMAN ROGERS
162
GEORGE DARBY
123
John Culme
76
George Brydges Rodney
21
7 Apr. 1784 ROBERT FANSHAWE
93
JOHN MACBRIDE
90
John Pollexfen Bastard
76
1 Feb. 1790 ALAN GARDNER vice Fanshawe, appointed to office
Main Article

In 1754 Lord Barrington was put up for Plymouth while still a lord of the Admiralty, but by the time he was elected he had been appointed master of the great wardrobe. ‘It will make no variation to our sentiments’, wrote to him one of the chief men in the corporation, ‘as the borough is truly loyal, and from our knowledge of your Lordship, as well as the interest we have always espoused of the Admiralty.’1Barrington mss. Barrington represented Plymouth for the next 24 years without ever having to fight an election. A great mass of correspondence on borough concerns among his papers bears witness to his exertions on its behalf; and a rebuke which Lord Sandwich, first lord of the Admiralty, addressed through him to the corporation, 27 Dec. 1774, was no doubt meant also as a hint to their zealous advocate:

I must be so plain as to tell you that there is something in the mode of application from our friends at Plymouth that revolts me frequently against their requests ... I have the utmost respect for the corporation of Plymouth, and acknowledge myself greatly obliged to them; but I cannot acquiesce in their recommending to all employments that fall vacant at Plymouth ... I must be allowed to be the proper judge what proportion of that favour is due to them and to others of my friends.

When Sir Charles Hardy died in 1780, an attempt was made to break the corporation’s control of the borough. Sir Frederick Leman Rogers, the Government candidate, was opposed by John Culme, standing on the right of the freeholders. The mayor returned Rogers, and Parliament was dissolved before Culme’s petition could be heard. At the general election, Culme had considerable support among the freemen themselves, and had his additional freeholder votes been accepted, would have been top of the poll. His second votes went to Admiral Rodney, in his absence, presumably as a gesture of loyalty. The petition was dismissed.

The two Government candidates stayed with North in 1784, and Robinson at one time reconciled himself to losing one of the seats, expecting Rogers to be returned again. Rogers did not stand, but John Macbride, a naval officer, carried one seat against the Government, defeating J. P. Bastard.

Author
Notes
  • 1. Barrington mss.