Background Information
Constituency business
Date Candidate Votes
5 Jan. 1559 SIR THOMAS PARRY
SIR RALPH SADLER
1562/63 SIR RALPH SADLER
HENRY CAPELL I
1571 SIR RALPH SADLER
SIR GEORGE CAREY
10 Apr. 1572 SIR RALPH SADLER
JOHN BROCKET
5 Nov. 1584 SIR RALPH SADLER
SIR HENRY COCKE
Edward Denny
6 Oct. 1586 SIR RALPH SADLER
SIR HENRY COCKE
3 Oct. 1588 ROBERT CECIL
SIR PHILIP BUTLER
1593 SIR ROBERT CECIL
SIR HENRY COCKE
Sir Edward Denny
22 Sept. 1597 SIR ROBERT CECIL
ROWLAND LYTTON
15 Oct. 1601 SIR ROBERT CECIL
SIR HENRY CAREY
Main Article

Throughout this period the senior Hertfordshire seat was monopolized by courtiers, and only three of the junior knights (Henry Capell I, John Brocket and Sir Philip Butler) can be regarded as independent. Sir George Carey and Henry Carey were to succeed to peerages; Henry Cocke obtained the lucrative office of cofferer of the Household in 1597; Rowland Lytton followed ‘his father in an hereditary dependence on’ the Cecils, eventually becoming captain of the gentlemen pensioners. Even Edward Denny, who twice contested the junior seat, though he was not even on the commission of the peace in Hertfordshire at the time of his first attempt, held a court appointment. However, as a general rule it was considered proper that courtiers should have estates in the counties that elected them and Sir Thomas Parry is the only Elizabethan Hertfordshire MP who did not.

Whether the independent country gentlemen of the county resented this domination by the court cannot be known, perhaps there were too few to count in what was even then commuting territory. Certain it is that the two, possibly three1Rowland Lytton was elected in 1601 against ‘great labour’ by the other side, but it is not known whether matters went as far as a poll. The suggestion has been made (Neale, Commons, 30) that Cocke may have been the loser on this occasion. contested elections had nothing to do with any court v. country feeling. In 1584 the independent Brocket supported Denny, who had just been given a court office, against Cocke, who at that time had not. After both Denny’s attempts to win a seat there were accusations of fraud and undue influence; indeed, Hertfordshire nicely illustrates how fortunate were the usual run of counties more distant from the court, where gentlemen could take turns among themselves in comparative amity.

Author
Notes
  • 1. Rowland Lytton was elected in 1601 against ‘great labour’ by the other side, but it is not known whether matters went as far as a poll. The suggestion has been made (Neale, Commons, 30) that Cocke may have been the loser on this occasion.