Background Information
Constituency business
Date Candidate Votes
1558/59 SIR NICHOLAS ARNOLD 1E371/402(1).
RICHARD PATE 2Ibid.
1562/63 SIR NICHOLAS ARNOLD
RICHARD PATE
1571 WILLIAM MASSINGER
THOMAS ATKINS
Richard Pate
1572 THOMAS SEMYS
THOMAS ATKINS
Richard Pate
17 Nov. 1584 LUKE GARNONS
THOMAS ATKINS
20 Sept. 1586 RICHARD PATE
THOMAS ATKINS
15 Oct. 1588 THOMAS ATKINS
LUKE GARNONS
1593 THOMAS ATKINS
RICHARD BIRDE II
6 Sept. 1597 WILLIAM OLDSWORTH
LUKE GARNONS
Thomas Atkins
1601 LUKE GARNONS
WILLIAM OLDSWORTH
Main Article

Gloucester received a renewal of its charter in 1561, vesting the government of the city in a mayor (elected by the aldermen and 12 common councilmen), recorder, town clerk (or deputy recorder), two sheriffs, 12 aldermen, various minor officials and a common council. The election writs went direct to the city sheriffs and some four or five hundred citizens could vote at the elections held at the guildhall. The size of the electorate, while ensuring independence from outside patrons, encouraged contested elections and faction struggles.

In 1559 and 1563 the first seat went to a country gentleman whose candidature should have been disallowed on the ground that an ordinance of 1555 had forbidden canvassing or voting for an outsider. True, Sir Nicholas Arnold was Arthur Porter’s brother-in-law, and he may have been supported by the commoners, but Porter himself had to go to Aylesbury for a seat in 1559. Clearly the whole story behind Arnold’s elections is not known: he was the only Gloucester MP in this period who was not a borough official. His fellow MP in 1559 and 1563 was the recorder Pate. However, in 1571 Pate was defeated by his deputy Atkins, who, relying on popular support, was returned to six consecutive Parliaments. This was humiliating for Pate, who applied for a new writ at least in 1572, and eventually accompanied Atkins to the Parliament of 1586. Atkins, though still supported by the popular party, was defeated at the 1597 election, and, although by this time in debt, embarked on extensive and fruitless litigation in Star Chamber.3Gloucester Recs. 32-33; Bristol and Glos. Arch.Soc. Trans. lvi. 209, 218; Weinbaum, Charters, 41-43; Gloucester archs. 1450, 1451, 1500.

Constituency Title Notes

An account of Gloucester is one of the set pieces in Neale, Commons, 272-81. See also DUDLEY, Sir Robert.

Author
Notes
  • 1. E371/402(1).
  • 2. Ibid.
  • 3. Gloucester Recs. 32-33; Bristol and Glos. Arch.Soc. Trans. lvi. 209, 218; Weinbaum, Charters, 41-43; Gloucester archs. 1450, 1451, 1500.