Ross was admitted a freeman of Norwich in 1589 and remained heavily involved in corporation affairs until his removal from the aldermanic body in 1642 for supporting the king.10 F. Blomefield, Hist. Norf. iii. 385. Almost nothing is known of his background or life beyond his official duties. He was frequently appointed to corporation committees,11 Norf. RO, NCR case 16/C/5, f. 385v; case 16/D/5, ff. 5v, 32. and in 1628 the Privy Council asked him, in his capacity as a Norfolk deputy-lieutenant, to help examine Norwich’s complaints on the billeting of Irish soldiers.12 APC, 1627-8, p. 367. As a senior corporation member, Ross probably supported Norwich in its battle to limit the number of soldiers billeted in and around the city.13 Norf. RO, NCR case 16/D/5, ff. 229, 238v. Ross owned lands in three Norwich parishes, and after 1613 leased a property from the corporation in Holm Street, St. Julian’s parish, at an annual rent of £7 6s. 8d. Although this sum was low, he was required to restore the buildings and make improvements worth £100.14 Ibid. case 16/C/5, f. 428v. He could afford these renovations, for being rated at £9 in goods for the subsidy in 1624, he was one of Norwich’s wealthiest inhabitants.15 E179/153/583.
As was customary for Norwich Members, Ross served only once in Parliament. His contribution to the 1621 assembly was small. On 2 May he proposed that the bill for the better relief of the poor in London be extended to encompass other regions.16 CJ, i. 602b. He also attended a committee meeting on the inferior courts bill, as did his fellow Norwich Member, William Denny.17 HLRO, main pprs. 20 Apr. 1621. Ross and Denny were ordered by Norwich corporation to introduce a bill for the city’s worsted weavers, but if they did so it failed to receive a first reading. They were sent a copy of a further measure to regulate Norwich stuffs and ‘dornick’ weaving exhibited by some Norwich merchants.18 Norf. RO, NCR case 16/A/15, ff. 327, 341, 526v; Kyle thesis, 113-20.
Ross drafted his will in July 1643, which was proved on 10 Apr. 1645. In it he left Norwich properties in St. Mary’s, St. Martin-in-the-Oak and St. Peter of Southgate to his son, Richard, while his daughter, Susan, was granted his other (unspecified) landholdings.19 Norf. RO, Norwich Consist. Ct. 4 Burlye, ff. 4v-5v. No further member of the family served in Parliament.