Pembroke, an integral part of the earldom of Pembroke comprising the parishes of St. Mary and St. Michael, was a chartered castellated borough, trading centre and old county town situated on the south side of the Cleddau estuary (Milford Creek), ten miles south-east of Haverfordwest and 13 by road and ferry from Milford. Its decline had been arrested in 1814 by the removal of the naval dockyard from Milford to Pater (Pembroke Dock). It was the polling town and its nominally elected mayor and bailiffs were the returning officers and assessors for the constituency. It had an indefinite number of common councillors (styled aldermen) and freemen. Tenby, a small seaport and growing resort on the Bristol Channel, 12 miles east of Pembroke, was governed locally by a mayor, common council and an unspecified number of freemen. Wiston, a small castellated village and manor approximately 15 miles from Pembroke and five miles from Haverfordwest, offered its patron the possibility of unlimited freeman creation as no qualification restrictions applied. Formerly the property of the Wogan family, it had been purchased for £38,000 in 1794 by John Campbell† of Stackpole Court (from 1796 Baron Cawdor) and remained a latent threat to the ability of the Owens of Orielton, whose attempts to disfranchise it had failed, to control the constituency. This they had done since 1626, by administering the corporations of Pembroke and Tenby in tandem.
The 1820 election was the second and likely to be the last at which Allen was returned unopposed under the 1816 agreement. His addresses and speeches called for retrenchment and lower taxes, upheld the ‘Whig’ principles of 1688, and accorded with his parliamentary conduct before and after 1820.
The solicitor Thomas Farrer warned Cawdor, 17 Nov. 1824, that he might have to sell Wiston to repay debts of over £40,000 secured on the 4,800-acre estate, owing to the lord privy seal, Lord Westmorland; and the estate, mansion, rectory, tithes and ‘contingency’ for creating unlimited freemen was advertised and offered for sale at Garraway’s coffee house, 12 Oct. 1825.
a material change ... [had] taken place in Pembrokeshire politics and I should guess that nearly one third of the Wiston burgesses (freemen) may be now influenced by Sir John Owen, and I do not think there has been a compensatory accession of Tenby and Pembroke burgesses to the Blue interest.
Quo warranto proceedings against Stokes and others had been considered as a means of weakening Owen’s hold on Pembroke and Tenby, but J.W. Russell (7 Oct.) and Allen, (30 Oct. 1825) reported problems in gaining access to the corporation books and that by-laws prohibiting copying made success unlikely in the short term. Meanwhile Wiston, for which bids of £40,000 to £63,600 were made at auction, failed to make its £70,000 reserve price and remained unsold.
The Liverpool ministry had taken Owen’s ability to oust Allen into consideration when choosing him to succeed Milford as lord lieutenant of Pembrokeshire in December 1823 and hoped that Philipps would assist him.
Short-time working at the dockyard did not prevent celebrations to mark the launch of the Clarence at Milford, 23 July 1827.
Hugh Owen was lax in his parliamentary attendance and left constituency business to his father, but his return at the 1830 election, sponsored by Abraham Leach and Jacob Richards, was unopposed and celebrated as usual at the Golden Lion.
When in March 1831 the reform bill left the constituency unchanged, Jones (in debate, 25 Mar.) suggested that Wiston, with its sole taxable house, owed its survival to political factors and Cawdor’s influence. When reintroduced in June, the bill left Wiston unchanged, but made Milford a contributory designate of Haverfordwest, with an enumerated population of 2,405 in 1821 and 2,984 in 1831, a contributory of Pembroke. The Owens and others alleged locally and in the House, 10 Aug. 1831, that the transfer was politically motivated and calculated to further Greville’s influence. Ministers disputed this interpretation of their effort to ‘balance the constituencies’ and reminded Owen that he was likely to retain the upper hand while, under the seven-mile rule, ‘old’ freemen remained enfranchised. Political expediency required him to support the bill and the Commons endorsed the change without a division. The commissioners confirmed Jones’s allegation that Wiston, which paid assessed taxes of £24 1s. 3d. in 1830, was ‘of no importance’, but recommended no change under the Boundary Act. Tenby, which paid over £1,210 in assessed taxes in 1830, retained the old distinction between the in and out-liberties. Doubts concerning the Monkton and St. Nicholas areas of Pembroke, which, without them in 1830, contributed £807 14s. in assessed taxes was removed by including them in the post-reform constituency, to which Milford, with assessed taxes of £379 6s. 6d., was expected to contribute up to 105 £10 voters.
in the freemen of Pembroke, Tenby and Wiston
Estimated voters: 1,400 in December 1831 (Pembroke and Tenby 900; Wiston 500)
