A rather enigmatic character, Villiers was reckoned by many to be a Jacobite but he was not averse to voting with the Whigs on occasion and he was a recipient of both a peerage from the Pretender and a pension from King George I.
On his return from a tour of France in 1701, where Matthew Prior‡ feared that he had developed a worrying propensity towards gambling, Villiers was made a teller of the exchequer, though his appointment does not feature in the official rolls and he seems never to have exercised the office.
In August 1711 Villiers succeeded his father as earl of Jersey. Shortly after succeeding to the peerage, he was elected to The Society, the group of which Jonathan Swift, Charles Talbot, duke of Shrewsbury, and Jersey’s brother-in-law, George Granville, later Baron Lansdowne, were members. Jersey appears to have been ejected from the club on Swift’s advice a few months later.
Jersey took his seat in the House on the single sitting day of 13 Nov. 1711. He then resumed his place at the opening of the 1711–12 session after which he was present on approximately 48 per cent of all sitting days. In or about December 1711 he was listed as a probable supporter of Oxford’s ministry and he was also included among the peers to be canvassed on the question of no peace without Spain. It is a reflection, perhaps, of the uncertainty with which Jersey was still viewed that his name appeared both as a supporter and as an opponent on lists forecasting votes in the division on whether or not to permit his kinsman James Hamilton, 4th duke of Hamilton [S], from sitting in the House by virtue of his British dukedom of Brandon. In the event, Jersey voted against disabling Hamilton from sitting as an hereditary British peer. The following year, on 9 Feb. 1712, Lionel Sackville, 7th earl (later duke) of Dorset, registered his proxy with Jersey, which was vacated on Dorset’s return to the House on 14 February. Two months later, on 26 Apr., Jersey was entrusted with that of James Berkeley, 3rd earl of Berkeley (like Dorset a member of the Kit Cat Club), which was vacated on 5 May. Following the debates over the address of thanks to the queen for her speech of 6 June outlining the details of the peace treaty, Jersey was one of a number of peers to absent themselves from the vote the next day on whether to append a clause to the address, a decision that contributed to the court securing a substantial majority.
Jersey attended the single sitting day on 25 Sept. 1712. Over the next few months, his brother-in-law, George Granville, newly ennobled as Baron Lansdowne, sought to link his own interests with those of Jersey. In December Lansdowne wrote to Oxford, concerned that he ‘should be wanting to your lordship’s service if I omitted putting you in mind of my Lord Jersey’ to be considered for one of the places then held by John Berkeley‡, 4th Viscount Fitzhardinge [I], whose death was imminent. Despite Lansdowne’s efforts, and rumours that he would indeed be gratified, Jersey’s pretensions were overlooked.
Present for a little under one-third of all sitting days in the session, on 1 June 1713 Jersey joined with Daniel Finch, 2nd earl of Nottingham, in seconding the Whig motion to adjourn the debate on dissolving the Union.
from the illiterate crew of fops, who disgrace the names they wear: I would have you enter the queen’s service, not because you are related to, or intimate with, those in power, but because you are wanted in it … in the midst of this dearth of capacity, which is but too apparent among the nobility …
Bolingbroke Corresp. iv. 274–7.
It was an aspiration never to be realized. In October, when Jersey was compelled to return to London, it was not in anticipation of government office but on account of his mother’s behaviour over the settlement of the 1st earl’s estate. Having refused to pay her late husband’s debts, the dowager countess had sold the personal estate and, shortly after, absconded to France, taking with her Jersey’s younger brother, Henry Villiers, despite his being the queen’s ward.
Jersey returned to the House on 16 Feb. 1714, after which he was present on approximately 65 per cent of all sitting days during the first session of the year. He voted with the Whigs against the government motion that the Protestant succession in the House of Hanover was not in danger.
Jersey’s hopes of attaining office died with Queen Anne. He attended just two days of the second session of 1714, but resumed his usual attendance pattern the following year, sitting on 78 days between March 1715 and June 1716. He rallied to the embattled Oxford and on 9 July 1715 dissented from the resolutions not to refer to the judges the question of whether the articles against Oxford amounted to treason and not to delay consideration of the articles against him, and from the resolution to commit him to Black Rod. The following month he subscribed the protest against the resolution to attaint Bolingbroke. Implicated in the Jacobite uprising of that year, Jersey was imprisoned in the Tower in September 1715, along with his sister and brother-in-law, Lansdowne, but it is noticeable that he was able to secure his release much more expeditiously than the other detainees: he was freed in December, while the Lansdownes remained incarcerated until February 1717.
Jersey resumed his seat in the House on 9 Jan. 1716. In April he was created earl of Jersey in the Jacobite peerage, an indication of the exiled court’s refusal to acknowledge his Williamite earldom. His dual honours were almost certainly the result of his mother’s intercession with the Pretender rather than on account of any efforts made by Jersey himself.
Jersey travelled to France the following May to recover his health, in company with the Jacobite Lucius Henry Cary, 6th Viscount Falkland [S].
Indulging perhaps in wishful thinking, Lady Jersey predicted in January 1720 that, given his continued state of ill health, her husband could not live long.
Jersey’s meagre possessions at his death included a one-eyed coach horse and a lame grey mare ‘that cannot go’. In all, his goods at Castlethorpe were valued at just £103 14s. 6d., though it was estimated that at his death he was owed rental income from his estates in Kent, Suffolk, Buckinghamshire, and Essex in excess of £800.
