Nothing is known for certain of Alanson’s origins, but it may be that he was a native of the borough he represented. In 1400 John Alanson was a litigant in the Carlisle mayor’s court; and in 1453, when our MP was elected for the borough, Thomas Alanson was an attestor to the joint return for Cumberland and Carlisle.
This personal connexion ensured that Alanson was well rewarded: on 1 Apr. 1448 he was appointed as controller of customs in the port of Kingston-upon-Hull at a daily fee of 7½d. His parliamentary service was probably another aspect of his service to Lumley. His first election, in January 1449, came at a time of crisis in Carlisle’s affairs. In the previous autumn the Scots had raided and burned the suburbs of the city, and the continued threat they posed later led the Crown to exempt the northern nobility from attendance at the Parliament summoned to meet at Westminster in the following February. These circumstances may, from the bishop’s point of view, have placed a particular premium on competent representation in the Commons, and it is surely more than coincidental that the other Carlisle MP was another of his servants, Robert Carlisle II*, steward of his lands at Dalston and Linstock. Alanson’s service there evidently satisfied his master for, on the following 14 July, two days before the dissolution, he was re-granted his customs office.
Lumley’s resignation as treasurer in September 1449 and his translation to the bishopric of Lincoln a few months later had, perhaps surprisingly, no adverse impact on Alanson’s career. He continued to serve in the Exchequer and moved into the service of the new bishop of Carlisle, Nicholas Close, one of the King’s chaplains. He also continued his career in the Commons, although some irregularity appears to have attached to his second election. In the indenture, attesting the return of Cumberland and Carlisle and dated at the county court held at Carlisle on 17 Oct. 1450, the names of the borough Members – Alanson and Avery Mauleverer* – have been written over an erasure, save for the final ‘r’ of ‘Mauleverer’. Further, the document itself gives the impression of having been hurriedly and untidily compiled, and it is probable that neither Alanson nor his colleague was the original choice of the burgesses of Carlisle. One can only speculate as to what lay behind this apparent amendment. The county attestors returned a prominent retainer of Percy and another of Neville; but the borough Members did not represent the same balance of interests, for Mauleverer was certainly a servant of Percy, and later evidence suggests that Alanson’s own sympathies were with Percy rather than Neville.
Alanson’s later apparent support for Percy arose both out of the consecration, in 1452, of William, son of Henry Percy (d.1455), earl of Northumberland, as bishop of Carlisle in succession to Close, and his own connexions within the royal household. During the early 1450s he established a close association with a rising star of the Lancastrian court, Richard Tunstall, who was, like him, a northerner. The two men first acted together in June 1449, when they stood mainpernors when the keeping of the estates of the late duke of Warwick were committed to John, Lord Tiptoft. In March 1451 and January 1453 our MP gave surety for royal grants made to Tunstall, and, more significantly, in June 1451, he shared with him the valuable office of money changer in Calais and England.
The brief interlude of the duke of York’s second protectorate appears to have brought Alanson some further difficulties. In Michaelmas term 1455 he and Tunstall were each fined 100 marks because a Yorkshire gentleman, for whom they had stood mainprise, had failed to find surety of the peace, and it is not surprising that Alanson should have taken the precaution of suing a general pardon in the following November.
Alanson appears to have left his unfortunate brother a difficult task. On 12 Dec. 1457 Henry granted all his goods to trustees headed by three lawyers, Thomas Bryan, William Eland* and Thomas Luyt*, presumably to protect them from our MP’s creditors. In the short term it did him little good. A month later he found himself confined to the Fleet for his failure to account for £110 that our MP had received from the Staffordshire tax collectors. In August 1462, however, he obtained a general pardon as our MP’s executor and was thus able to extinguish the Crown’s claims.
