Although in his later years Basyng was said to be living in the Somerset vill of Stanton Drew there is no evidence to show that he belonged to the family of Basyng which came from that county or was closely related to Gilbert Basyng, sometime tax collector there, who died in 1436.
The description of Basyng as a ‘gentleman’ suggests that he was a lawyer, and indeed in the mid 1440s he acted as an attorney in the court of common pleas for litigants from Wiltshire.
Basyng served as a juror at judicial inquiries conducted by commissioners of oyer and terminer at Malmesbury in the summer of 1452 and at Salisbury early in 1453, which were mainly concerned with the events surrounding the killing of Bishop Aiscough at the time of Cade’s rebellion.
At the same time as Basyng assisted Sir Edmund and his associates in their private affairs, the knight was ready to reciprocate. In August 1450 Hungerford and William Basyng had become feoffees of certain lands and tenements known as ‘Wodelye’ in Great Chalfield, in a transaction in which our MP delivered seisin to them. Three years later the feoffees settled the same on Edward and his wife Ellen, daughter of the late John Flory, together with more land known as ‘Smalbonesclos’ and ‘Cokesmede’. For whatever the reason towards the end of 1462 the couple relinquished the property to a group of trustees headed by Gilbert Kymer, the dean of Salisbury cathedral, who were acting on behalf of the acquisitive lawyer Thomas Tropenell* (an important member of the Hungerford circle). Tropenell was always obsessively concerned to retain documentary evidence of his transactions as proof of title, and accordingly Basyng sent him the formal release of the property and nine other deeds relating to it, saying in his letter that if there was anything else he and his wife might do for Tropenell ‘ye shall fynde us both redy, at your cost, at all tymes’. Money had already been offered: he concluded, ‘as touchyng to the xs. I pray you to delyver to my servant’.
Basyng long continued his association with Sir Edmund Hungerford. He was among those made feoffees of Sir Edmund’s estates in November 1469, at a time not only of intensifying political crisis nationally, but when the Hungerfords were facing financial ruin following the executions of Sir Edmund’s nephew Robert, 3rd Lord Hungerford, and the latter’s son and heir (Sir) Thomas*.
Where Basyng stood politically during the civil war is impossible to know, although his links with die-hard Lancastrians clearly made him vulnerable during the years of Yorkist rule. His brother-in-law John Flory of Cloford initially accepted the accession of Edward IV, but then, having decided to leave England to join the forces of Margaret of Anjou, allegedly plotted the King’s destruction. On 21 Jan. 1465, the last day of the Parliament begun in 1463, the sheriffs of London were ordered to make proclamation that if Flory failed to appear in King’s bench on 1 July to submit to royal grace and answer what was laid against him, he would stand convicted and attainted of high treason and his lands would be forfeited. Flory failed to appear, so incurred the penalty. His heir William Basyng (his late sister’s son by our MP), successfully presented a petition to Parliament in the summer of 1474 asking that the act be made void, and he might duly come into his inheritance.
Lying on his deathbed Basyng made a brief will on 20 or 21 June 1490. Describing himself as ‘of Cloford’, he left the residue of his goods to his then wife, Alice, and named his son William as sole executor. Curiously, he asked to be buried in the cemetery of St. Mary’s church at Staines in Middlesex, near the principal river-crossing on the road to London. This raises the possibility that he fell ill while journeying to or from the capital. The inquisition post mortem held in Somerset referred only to a messuage and land he had held in Bruton, and stated that William, the heir, was aged 25. If this was true it would mean that at the time of the petition to the Parliament of 1474 William had still been a minor, and if so his father probably acted at Westminster on his behalf.
