Thomas Chamber, from a family established in Northamptonshire only in the previous generation, was a notable figure, combining a military career with a prominent role in local administration. His mother brought to his father an interest in the manors of Spratton and nearby Holdenby, a few miles to the north of Northampton, together with a manor at Hanwell in Oxfordshire; and our MP was later to make good his title to these lands. He was a minor at his father’s death, but his mother’s survival saved him from wardship: she was alive at least as late as 1411, when she presented to her church at Holdenby.
Little is known of Chamber in the early years of his majority. He was of age by May 1408 when he joined Richard Wydeville* and others in offering mainprise in as much as 1,000 marks for the appearance of his half-brother, Sir John Chamber, in Chancery.
Despite this evidence of his presence in France, it seems that Chamber was back at home early in 1422 to conclude a very important domestic matter. His right to his mother’s lands, which represented his entire inheritance, was questionable. The common-law heir was his half-sister, Alice, his mother’s daughter by the second of her three husbands, and, if later pleadings are to be taken at face value, he had disseised her of the property (a disseisin that had taken place by March 1419 when he presented to the church of Holdenby). These same pleadings also state that, on 28 Feb. 1422, Alice made a quitclaim of the manors to our MP, binding herself and her heirs to warrant the title of him and his heirs. For the rest of his life Chamber appears to have had untroubled possession of property, although the whole matter raises difficulties which cannot be resolved by the available evidence. Alice’s husband had been his kinsman, Roger Chamber, with whom Thomas had served in Clarence’s retinue in 1415; and it may be that our MP’s entry and her surrender were prompted by his death leaving only daughters. Another possibility, however, is raised by litigation after our MP’s death, namely that Alice’s quitclaim was a forgery concocted by his nephew and heir, William Chamber. On balance, this accusation is probably to be rejected, but it does gain some indirect support from the fact that our MP may have been in France when the quitclaim was made.
A delay in acquiring his mother’s property, whether by fair means or not, combined with the costs of a military career, would explain several of the early references to Chamber. Between November 1413 and February 1422 he had occasion to sue pardons of outlawry incurred on suits of debt sued by five separate London citizens. The sums involved were not large, none greater than 16 marks, but it was curious that a man of his rank should have let suits run so far. This may represent no more than carelessness in the pleading of protections; even so, it is not a mark of prosperity.
After his half-sister’s quitclaim (assuming it to have been genuine), Chamber had a much firmer basis for a career in local politics, and on 29 Oct. 1422 he embarked on such a career with election to represent his native shire in company with another soldier, Henry Mulsho*.
This apparent commitment to service abroad, at a time when many gentry of his rank had abandoned it, makes it surprising that, only five months after undertaking to return to France, Chamber was named to the Northamptonshire shrievalty. His term of office proved, however, only a brief distraction from further military service. Either he or a namesake is again recorded as in the garrison at Pont-de-l’Arche early in 1428; in May of that year he sued out further letters of protection as going to France in Buckland’s retinue; and on the following 27 June he was commissioned to take the muster of the earl of Salisbury at Barham Down.
Chamber was back in England in February 1429, when he joined his stepson, William Vaux*, in offering surety in Chancery that William, Lord Zouche, would keep the peace to Sir John Culpepper*.
This election is suggestive of Chamber’s wider connexions. Both Buckland and Ash, who he employed as a feoffee in 1428, were associated with Cardinal Beaufort; and it is probable that the two Northamptonshire MPs were returned as supporters of the cardinal, who had a number of other supporters in this Parliament. It is a fair assumption that Buckland had introduced Chamber to the Beaufort service. Significantly, in Nov. 1431 and July 1432, Chamber received assignments at the Exchequer of £40 on behalf of the executors of the cardinal’s nephew, Thomas Beaufort, count of Perche, killed a month earlier, for the expenses incurred in the custody of Thomas’s hostage, Charles d’Artois, count of Eu.
A Beaufort connexion would help to explain why Chamber was so active in local administration during the 1430s. Before the end of the decade he had completed two further terms as sheriff and, between his terms, had sat in the Parliament of 1435 in company with Tresham. Strangely, however, despite his three terms as sheriff, he was not appointed to the routine commissions of county government, and he made only a very brief appearance on the commission of the peace. Indeed, this latter appointment seems to have been made in error for it came while he was sheriff, and his last shrievalty effectively marked the end of his administrative career. Age may have begun to catch up with him, but he continued to be active in the affairs of his neighbours. On 1 Aug. 1441, in company with his stepson, he was a witness at Castle Ashby to an important deed by which the manor there was settled in jointure on Edmund, Lord Grey of Ruthin, and his new wife, Katherine, daughter of Henry Percy, earl of Northumberland. At the end of the same year he was an attestor when Vaux and Tresham were elected to Parliament in what appears to have been a contest. In 1444 he was named, alongside Humphrey, earl of Stafford, as a feoffee in three Norfolk manors belonging to Sir Thomas Kerdiston* in the interest of Kerdiston’s wife, Philippa Trussell, a Northamptonshire heiress.
Chamber died soon after. Both he and his wife were certainly dead by 1449, when her son, William Vaux, had an action pending for close-breaking at her property at Shangton.
