The origins of the Druell family of Exeter and Halberton have not been established with any degree of certainty, but they apparently first began to play a part in local society in the south-west after the collation of Master John Druell, the later MP’s uncle, as archdeacon of Exeter and a canon of Exeter cathedral in 1444.
Druell had a personal interest in the quarrel, for it was sparked by an incident in which he had himself played a part. At some point during his year as a city steward a malefactor had been pursued into Exeter cathedral by two of the city’s serjeants. When the officials entered the church, the doors were suddenly shut behind them. Druell and his fellow steward Thomas Sampson
folwed fresshely with ynne the space of xvj. fote to kepe the pees and might not entre yn at that dore ne none other dore but at one dore: and so they entred yn, and when they so come yn there they founde the saide sergeantis at grete myschif and … Sr John Jon with a dore barre and Sr Lewis Walssheman John Panton and meny other ministers of the saide churche to thaym unknowed with swerdis custellis long knyvis and yryssh skenes drawyn yn theire hondis to have sleyn the saide sergeantis and wold so have sleyn ham ne hadde y be as God yeaf grace the saide stiwardis with other came yn to kepe the pees. And when they come yn they smote to the saide Richard Druell with a custell apon the Kyngis mace as hit is sygne yet, so that alle bothe stiwardis and sergeantis stode yn despayre of theire lyvys and unneth scaped out of the churche with theire lyvys.
Ibid. 78.
The dispute continued throughout the winter of 1447-8 with an exchange of articles between the city and cathedral authorities, but by the spring of 1448 the canons of Exeter were beginning to seek a peaceful settlement, and Master John Druell was taking a leading part in this. Mayor Shillingford wrote to Richard Druell, then again lobbying the chancellor in London, of his uncle’s ‘speciall diligent and tender laboure’ and was able to report that as a result of the chancellor’s intervention ‘ther is by twene the parties … grete gode wyll, worship, courtesy, reverence, yn procession specially; fayre, gode, gentell, and curteys longage; gode chere and right wellcome, gode welfare, and grete festis yn the Chanons parte, and of youre unkell M. John Dru[ell] most specially, and every day better than other’: a valuable development indeed, as John Druell had previously exacerbated the discord between city and cathedral by pulling down a wall to make a gate into his garden.
In view of the prominent role that Richard Druell had played in defending the citizens’ rights, it is not surprising that he continued to play his part in Exeter’s government in subsequent years. He served as a member of the council of 12 from 1447 to 1449, and for much of 1448 and 1449 he also held office as a constable of the Exeter staple. In the autumn of the latter year, however, Druell’s civic career suddenly came to an abrupt halt. Although he was among the citizens electing mayor, stewards and council in both this and the following year, within a few days in October 1449 he relinquished both his position at the staple and his membership of the council. It is probable that the interruption to his career was in some way connected with charges brought against him in the court of common pleas by the city attorney, Henry Brock*, who accused him and a fellow member of the council, the merchant John Betty, of abducting his son and heir.
Druell’s performance as receiver secured him the mayoralty of Exeter in the autumn of 1458. The previous spring, the earl of Devon had died at Abingdon and been succeeded by his eldest son, Thomas, the murderer of the city’s recorder Nicholas Radford*. The citizens could, however, not afford to let such considerations overshadow their relations with the most important magnate in the county, and Druell thus rode on more than one occasion in his own person to secure the new earl’s support in their affairs. Central to these was an ambitious project to procure an extension of the city’s liberties, and Druell himself rode to London to petition the King and his council that henceforth every mayor of Exeter might be ex officio considered a justice of the peace in his city. While in London, Druell and his fellows took care to curry favour with Henry Holand, duke of Exeter, by generous gifts of fish and a dinner, and by wining and dining the duke’s servants at the Tower, as well as seeking the support of Henry VI’s secretary and paying one of the King’s priests to badger the monarch over the augmentation of Exeter’s charters.
It is impossible to tell whether Druell, whose mayoralty ended more than a week before the confrontation at Ludford Bridge, in any way fell foul of the lords supporting the claims of Richard, duke of York, but from Michaelmas 1460 to 1462 he was once again omitted from the ranks of the city council and of the civic electors.
By this time, Richard Neville, earl of Warwick, and the King’s brother, George, duke of Clarence, were becoming increasingly dissatisfied with Edward IV’s rule, a discontent which culminated in Edward’s exile and the restoration of King Henry VI in October 1470. In November the restored rulers summoned a Parliament, and it appears that Druell was one of the men elected by the citizens of Exeter to represent them in this assembly. Certainly, he was present at Westminster during Parliament, and received payments from the city authorities for a bill of proviso sued out before Christmas – presumably to secure exemption from an expected Act of Resumption – and for copies of various bills passing in Parliament during the Lenten session.
It seems clear that the Readeption government placed some degree of trust in Druell, who in December was prominent among the commissioners appointed to inquire into offences committed in Exeter, a commission which he himself had sued out at a cost of 2s. 10d.
No similar controversies appear to have marred Druell’s final years, during which he continued to hold local office. In spite of another unexplained hiatus in his membership of the council of 24 from the autumn of 1476, he was elected to a fourth mayoralty in 1481. He took the precaution of suing out a pardon from Richard III in May 1484.
