In spite of residing and holding office at Ipswich, French appears not to have been a typical burgess, since there is no evidence that he pursued a trade. An associate of the Suffolk lawyer, John Staverton,
An inquisition of May 1400, held in the Essex port of Harwich, supplies the earliest known reference to French. The jury reported that he and two other Ipswich men had hired a small boat from ‘Fyssebane’ to take them across the Orwell estuary towards Harwich. Upon embarking, they had commanded its crew to row across to a vessel belonging to William Fuller of Nacton, which they had forcibly boarded, removing from it a priest, a boy and various items. The jury added that they had also taken two purses, containing ten marks in gold and silver coins, from the priest, John Brygge, on their return to ‘Fyssebane’.
French also ran into trouble on another occasion in the early fifteenth century, this time in his capacity as bailiff of the hundred of Hartismere in north Suffolk, an administrative division under de la Pole lordship. At some stage before 1419, William Wingfield (son and heir of Sir William Wingfield†) filed a bill in Chancery about the Wingfield manor of Hintlesham, a liberty over which no outside official had any jurisdiction. Despite this, French had entered the property, where he had executed writs, issued orders and oppressed the tenants. Wingfield’s purpose in going to Chancery was to call him to account for his actions, but the bill is the only evidence from the suit to have survived. Whatever the truth of its claims, it is worth noting that Hintlesham was not in Hartismere hundred.
Also in the early fifteenth century, French was a feoffee of land in the west Suffolk parish of Exning, on behalf of the London goldsmith, Drew Barantyn†,
The Parliament of 1422 coincided with a lawsuit in which French was a defendant, for by Michaelmas term 1422 William Stephen had begun a suit against him and John Wade, a ‘shipman’ from Ipswich, in the court of King’s bench for allegedly assaulting and wounding him and his servants. The plea roll describes French as a ‘serjeant’, suggesting that he was serving as one of the borough of Ipswich’s four serjeants at the time.
Some 18 months after the dissolution of the Parliament of 1431, French was yet again a defendant in King’s bench, this time in a lawsuit brought by Sir William Drury. Drury laid an information against him, Gilbert Debenham I* and Thomas Predis (a husbandman from Copdock), as well as the men who had sat as jurors in a recent assize of novel disseisin (relating to property in Sproughton) in which Sir William had been the defendant. In pleadings of Hilary term 1433, Drury charged Debenham, French and Predis of having corruptly influenced the assize jury in favour of the plaintiffs, Thomas Sampson and his wife. He alleged that Sampson had plied Debenham, French and Predis with money, food and drink at Brockford the previous September in order to buy their support, claiming that French had received 40s. and Debenham no less than £20. In response to these charges, French and his fellow defendants sought licence to imparl, and the case probably ended in an out of court settlement.
Although his career as an office-holder was apparently over by the time of Debenham’s suits, French was still active at Ipswich during the 1440s. As the chamberlains’ account for 1446-7 records, the borough paid him and John Douche 16s. 8d. that year as recompense for the damages they had suffered at the hands of the sheriff of Norfolk and Suffolk in matters concerning its liberties. It is impossible to tell whether they had actively defended these rights, recently enhanced by the town’s charter of 28 Mar. 1446, or had simply fallen victim to an over-zealous sheriff, possibly ignorant that, thanks to the charter, royal officials could now no longer operate within the liberties.
As for John French junior, he was almost certainly the MP’s son. Active in Ipswich and the wider county of Suffolk from at least 1430,
