The Giffards were an ancient Devon family resident at Halsbury to the south-west of Barnstaple, who traced their lineage back to Walter Giffard, a companion of the Conqueror at Hastings whose son was subsequently created earl of Buckingham.
It is probable that it was Giffard’s professional reputation that recommended him to the burgesses of Liskeard, who returned him to Parliament in 1431 alongside another lawyer, Robert Skelton I*. Nothing is recorded of Giffard’s activity in the Commons, but he may in some way have attracted the government’s attention, since less than a year after the dissolution he was appointed controller of customs at Exeter and Dartmouth. While still serving in this capacity, he was sent to the Commons once more, this time by the north Devon port of Barnstaple. This borough he could with some justification regard as his home town, for he held land in the locality and was closely connected with the borough’s merchant community. While Giffard was sitting in this Parliament his was replaced as controller. This did not, however, put an end to his public career. In the autumn of 1434 the new sheriff of Cornwall, Thomas Bonville*, a man with whom Giffard had previous professional connexions, appointed him his under sheriff, and he was to serve a second term in the same post in 1439-40 during the shrievalty of Sir Thomas Beauchamp*.
Giffard’s relations with his neighbours were not always of a cordial nature. On frequent occasions he can be found squabbling with the merchants of Barnstaple and other local men over debts. No details of the background to bonds for £12 made to Giffard by Thomas Rescruk* and Richard Cheket of Callington in February 1438 have been discovered, but there were also more serious instances of discord.
Potentially even more serious was Giffard’s clash with Thomas Courtenay, earl of Devon, around the same time. On this occasion, it was Giffard who was said to have illicitly seized John Speccote, an heir whose wardship was claimed by the earl. In view of Giffard’s earlier association with Thomas, the brother of Sir William Bonville, it is tempting to speculate whether the increasingly acrimonious quarrel between the earl and the Bonvilles played a part in the affair, but no further evidence to support such an hypothesis has come to light.
Unquestionably, many of the offices held by Giffard could be potentially lucrative. Thus, in January 1440 the burgesses of Exeter paid him as much as 20s. to expedite the return of a writ, and were further prepared to seal a bond indemnifying him from any resultant litigation.
