The name Gough was a common one among Englishmen of Welsh origins, but it is likely that the man who represented Devizes in 1437 hailed from south-western England. His parentage has not been established with any degree of certainty, but he was the son of a man of the same name from whom he was distinguished by the style of ‘junior’. The father was apparently still alive in 1432, when the son received a life annuity of 40s. from John Chichester of Raleigh in Devon.
The younger John evidently received some training in the law, but no details of his education have come to light. It is probable that he owed his pension from Chichester to his professional services to the wealthy esquire, and throughout his career he was employed as an attorney, mainpernor or feoffee by a variety of individuals. Equally, it seems likely that his sole recorded return to Parliament also came about as part of his legal practice. From the 1430s the men of Devizes, who had previously shown a strong preference for local clothiers as their parliamentary representatives, increasingly turned to professional men to safeguard their interests in the Commons. Thus, in 1431, 1432 and 1435 they returned John Giles* and in 1433 John Whittocksmead*, and there can be little doubt that Gough’s candidature was also acceptable to the borough elite, since his parliamentary sureties included in John Craye* a man of impeccable local credentials.
By this date, Gough may already have formed the association with the rising lawyer John Fortescue* which would determine his later career. During the 1420s and 1430s Fortescue had gathered considerable parliamentary experience in the service of four west-country boroughs, but in 1437 (his last Parliament) he at last sat as a knight of the shire, being returned for the county of Wiltshire. It may thus not have been mere coincidence that Gough sat for a borough in the same county, where neither of them had landed interests of significance. In subsequent years, Gough remained part of Fortescue’s inner circle, being regularly associated with him in his land transactions and enfeoffments.
By comparison with his well-documented professional activities, little is known of Gough’s personal affairs, many of which are difficult to distinguish from those of his synonymous father and son. It may, however, have been he who in 1434 quarrelled with William, Lord Botreaux: the cause of their disagreement is unknown.
The exact date of Gough’s death has not been established, but it probably occurred not long before 29 June 1470, when a writ of diem clausit extremum in his name was sent to the escheator of Devon and Cornwall.
