Huls, who came from a large Cheshire family which was well established in the county by the mid fourteenth century, was related to Hugh Huls (d.1415), a justice of the King’s Bench from 1394, who played an important role in Henry V’s administration of North Wales.
Hugh’s subsequent success may therefore have owed something to the prominence of his more illustrious relatives, and their connexions with the Crown. It was probably no coincidence that, like the former judge, he made a name for himself in North Wales: as early as 1429 he was one of three men authorized to adjudicate in a dispute concerning the inheritance in Caernarvon and Anglesey of the late Henry Parys, son of Robert Parys†, a former chamberlain of Chester and North Wales.
As Wales and the palatinate of Chester were not represented in Parliament in this period, Huls had to look elsewhere for a seat in the Commons. Strikingly, the three different boroughs he represented in three consecutive Parliaments were all very far from his home in the north-west of England. The reasons behind his election for East Grinstead, Gatton and Midhurst are unclear, as no direct connexion has been established between him and any of these places. Perhaps his satisfactory performance as a Crown servant played some part in his returns to the Commons, particularly at East Grinstead, which formed part of the duchy of Lancaster estates in Sussex.
The accession of Edward IV may briefly have threatened Huls’s employment by the Crown in Wales, but in the event any fears of redundancy were to prove unfounded. Far from being discarded, he was appointed in November 1461 as one of the auditors of the accounts of royal officials in Cheshire and Flint.
