In the later part of his career this Thomas Lewknor becomes difficult to distinguish from his nephew and namesake, the eldest son of (Sir) Roger and heir not only to the principal Lewknor estates but also to the moiety of the former Camoys lands which belonged to the inheritance of his mother. We can be certain, however, that it was our MP who was enfeoffed in 1448 with his father and two of his brothers in the Halsham family estates in Norfolk, Kent and Wiltshire which had been inherited by the wife of his brother John. He continued to be involved in transactions relating to these properties for at least 17 years.
It is worthy of note that when the dispute over the Tregoz estates had been the subject of suits in the court of common pleas and in Chancery, Thomas may have been sitting in the Commons as a representative of the Somerset borough of Bridgwater. How he had come to be elected by the burgesses there remains unclear; no connexion with them, or with the feudal lords of the borough (one of whom was the duke of York, fresh from his victory at St. Albans), has been discovered. Indeed, there seems to have been some opposition to his candidacy, for although Lewknor’s name appears on the sheriff’s indenture it was replaced by that of a local man, Robert Cotys II*, on the schedule accompanying the indenture to Chancery at the start of the Parliament. Which of the two men actually entered the Commons on that occasion is not known.
Previous to the election, in May 1454 Thomas had been appointed in Sussex with two of his brothers and their kinsman Sir Richard Fiennes to arrest the troublesome Robert Poynings, in response to acts passed in the Parliament of 1453-4 as an alleged traitor. It seems that in the long-lasting and violent dispute over the Poynings estates between Robert and his niece Eleanor (who from the death of her father-in-law at St. Albans in 1455 was countess of Northumberland), these commissioners supported the latter. Their half-brother Thomas Hoo II was actively engaged in the late 1450s as the financial agent for Eleanor’s husband, Henry Percy, the new earl of Northumberland, his brief also covering Percy’s shipment of wool through Chichester harbour by special licence of the King. When, in the autumn of 1456, Thomas secured appointment as customer in Chichester for a year, this can only have worked to the Percys’ advantage, and eased Hoo’s tasks. No doubt he owed the office to their influence. The Lewknors were also on good terms with Richard West, Lord de la Warre, and in June 1457 Thomas and his brothers Sir Roger and Richard joined Lord Richard in receiving a gift of goods and chattels.
Thomas’s movements during the period of civil war from 1459 to 1461 are undocumented, and a suit he initiated in the court of common pleas in Hilary term 1461 raises more questions than it answers. In his plea he accused Eleanor, the widow of (Sir) Thomas Brown II*, and two of her sons of assaulting him at Southwark with the intention of killing him. The date of the alleged attack is not given in the record. Brown, who had incurred the enmity of the duke of York, had been executed in the previous July following the Yorkist victory at Northampton, but why his widow should have quarreled with our MP is hard to say. The political implications of the pardon Lewknor obtained from Edward IV on 12 Dec. 1462 remain obscure. The pardon, of any offences committed before the opening day of Edward’s first Parliament, described him as ‘formerly of Horsted Keynes, esquire, alias late of London’, and as it referred to his post in the customs service was probably intended to protect him from the consequences of any failings while in office.
When Henry VI was restored to the throne in the following autumn, the Lewknor brothers were as usual primarily concerned with their own family affairs. Three of them – Thomas, John and Richard – stood as guarantors that their half-brother Hoo would re-pay debts amounting to over £800, by entering bonds which were sealed while the Readeption Parliament was in progress in November or December 1470, although whether any of them were then Members of the Commons is not known. At the same time Thomas and John were enfeoffed of Richard’s estates in Sussex, perhaps to safeguard them in the disturbed political climate.
Sir Roger’s son and heir, Thomas, our MP’s nephew and namesake, had been making his mark in the early 1470s as a commissioner of array and as sheriff of Surrey and Sussex in 1473-4; and it was he who on 24 Nov. 1474 had contracted to serve in Edward IV’s army for the invasion of France.
On 1 Jan. 1492, while the Parliament was in recess, Lewknor made his will. He asked to be buried in St. Mary’s church at Goring, and left 52s. to be shared among 12 paupers at the rate of 1d. each every week for a year. The residue of his estate was left to his wife Elizabeth, who along with his brother Richard and two of his nephews, Roger and Edward Lewknor, were to act as executors. Although probate was not granted until six years later, it is clear that he died soon after making his will, and most likely on 6 Feb. 1492, the day that a writ de diem clausit extremum was issued from Chancery.
