Of those returned to represent Derby during the Lancastrian period, none had more tenuous connexions with the borough than Lovet. He lived in the north of the county at Woodhouse in the parish of Baslow, and, given what is known of his political affiliations, there can be little doubt that he was a tenant of the Talbots. It is in connexion with that great family that he first appears in the records. In Trinity term 1453 he was among over 80 men appealed in the court of King’s bench by one John Walwyn for murder. No details of the offence appear and the appeal was quickly dropped. It is, however, clear that the alleged murderers were Talbot servants for they were headed by such senior members of the Talbot retinue as Thomas Wortley of Wortley (Yorkshire), Thomas Everingham of Sheffield (Yorkshire) and Robert Barley*.
For Lovet his appearance in Parliament probably represented the high point of his career, yet he long continued to be a man of modest account. In March 1455 he was named on a petty jury panel to try (Sir) William Vernon* at Chesterfield for felony; at a session of the peace on 10 Jan. 1458 he served on a jury which indicted Humphrey Bourgchier* for an entry into his master the earl of Shrewsbury’s manor of South Wingfield; and when commissioners of oyer and terminer visited the county in April 1468 he was named to the grand jury panel. On this latter occasion he himself was the subject of an indictment, as one of those to whom (Sir) Walter Blount* had illegally given livery at Barton Blount on 20 May 1461. Perhaps Lovet was anxious to attach himself to Blount’s rising star in the wake of Shrewsbury’s death at the battle of Northampton, but there is no other evidence to connect him with Blount.
In 1467 a more serious charge was laid against Lovet: he was appealed of murder for the second time, on this occasion as one of many accessories to the killing of one Nicholas Fox of Newbold near Chesterfield on 31 Mar. 1466.
Lovet’s appearance as an arbiter, albeit late in his career, implies that he was a man of some legal knowledge, and this is confirmed by last known appearance in the records. Despite his own earlier involvement in crime, by the summer of 1478 he was acting as one of the coroners of his native county.
