The Penriths were a long-established local family. Robert Penrith† represented Newcastle-upon-Tyne in the Parliament of 1348, and Thomas Penrith, a merchant, played an active part in the town’s affairs in the 1420s and 1430s. In 1429 he attested the borough’s parliamentary election; he served as a juror in the inquisitions held in the town on the deaths of the great merchant, Roger Thornton†, in 1430 and of John, duke of Bedford, in 1436; and in 1434-5 he held office as the town’s sheriff.
On 21 Oct. 1456, not long after the conclusion of this Parliament, Penrith secured further advancement with appointment as customs collector in Newcastle, and he was eminently qualified for his election as mayor in September 1458. In the following February, while mayor, he secured from the Crown the farm of the alnage in Northumberland and Newcastle for 24 years (at an annual farm of a modest 11s.), and took a 20-year lease of the ‘King’s Meadow’ by the river Tyne, a lease granted only the previous year to his friend, Alan Bird.
Whether Penrith supported the Lancastrian regime in this Parliament can only be a matter for speculation. In the following autumn he was removed as collector of customs in the aftermath of the Yorkist victory at Northampton, and in November 1461 he surrendered his grant of the alnage to the Exchequer clerk, William Green.
Little evidence survives of Penrith’s personal affairs, save for his involvement in overseas trade. In 1450 he was among a group of Newcastle merchants, including Bird and Richardson, who secured relief from the customs due on two lost cargoes of wool (on The Peter of Newcastle, lost to storms, and Le Mariknight of Dordrecht, lost to pirates from Dieppe) exported in 1446 and 1449.
Penrith married, although the identity of his wife is unknown. In a Chancery petition of the early 1480s she was said to be a cousin of Robert Folbery†, then recorder of Newcastle. This petition, presented by John Broun, a chapman from Darlington, co. Durham, also sheds further light on Penrith’s business dealings. Broun claimed to have given Penrith woolfells to take to London to satisfy a debt of £11 they jointly owed to another John Broun, a London mercer (neither of these John Brouns are to be identified with the man who had succeeded our MP as tronager). On his return Penrith gave the obligation to his wife, who, instead of cancelling it, after her husband’s death sued an action of debt upon it against the Darlington Broun with the connivance of her erstwhile cousin.
