The Penroses were a gentry family established in Cornish society by the reign of Edward II. The family’s pedigree in the fifteenth century is convoluted, but it appears that by the latter years of Richard II’s reign two important cadet branches had been established in the south-west. The Penroses of Escalls in Sennen rose to a high degree of prominence in John Penrose j.KB, one of the most unscrupulous men ever to serve as an English judge, but under the Lancastrian kings the line’s fortunes declined sharply following the judge’s dismissal from the bench, his son and heir’s idiocy, and the grant of the family estates to the grasping courtier John Trevelyan*.
The man who represented Helston in Parliament in 1442 came from a different branch of the family, living not far from that borough at Methleigh in Sithney. A John Penrose of Methleigh, the son of Bernard Penrose and his wife, Joan, and the father of the later Helston Member, had represented Liskeard in 1411.
Although the Penroses of Methleigh did not mix with the very greatest of the Cornish gentry, they were evidently well connected among their immediate neighbours, both within the town of Helston and in the surrounding countryside. Throughout his life, John frequently witnessed the property transactions of the minor gentry families of the far south-west, the Trewoofes, Lannarghs and Bevilles.
Not always, however, were Penrose’s relations with his neighbours unequivocally cordial. In October 1431 commissioners of oyer and terminer were appointed to investigate claims by William Antron that John together with his wife’s kinsmen Peter and Geoffrey St. Aubyn had waylaid him at Helston and wounded and maltreated him in an attempt to murder him.
Penrose lived on into Edward IV’s second reign, and it was probably he who in November 1473 attested a deed for James Lannargh alongside a John Penrose ‘junior’, and who around the same time quarreled with the lawyer Henry Gilliot over a house in Tresprison (in Mullan or Wendron). Six years later, a related transaction was witnessed by just one John Penrose and it is likely that this was the younger man, and that the MP had died in the intervening years.
