CONINGSBY, Sir Ralph (c.1555-1616), of North Mimms, Herts.

Coningsby’s grandfather, a younger son, acquired North Mimms in 1530.VCH Herts. ii. 254. By his first marriage, Coningsby himself gained 11 messuages in London, but for the greater part of his adult life he was dependent on his mother for his maintenance.London Inquisitions (Index Lib. xxvi), 48-9. His father, uneasily conscious that ‘all my goods and chattels will not by great sums of money extend to pay my debts and legacies’, left her his entire estate for 20 years after his death, and in 1595 Coningsby begged to be excused from taking over his father’s captaincy in the local militia because ‘he greatly depending upon her [his mother] for maintenance, he cannot trouble her in such a chargeable matter’.PROB 11/77, f. 37; CSP Dom. 1595-7, p. 108. As a Middlesex freeholder he served on the jury that condemned (Sir) Walter Ralegh† for complicity in the Main Plot.State Trials, ii. 4. In 1606 he joined his two brothers in the sale of various outlying estates, including property in Surrey.VCH Surr. iii. 169. As ranger of Enfield Chase he looked after the rather limited sporting interests of the 1st earl of Salisbury (Robert Cecil†), who granted him the benefit of a recusancy in 1608.Herts. Recs. i. 41; Add. 34765, f. 25; HMC Hatfield, xvii. 127. Three years later Coningsby led the Hertfordshire delegation, appointed by the magistrates at quarter sessions in consultation with the principal freeholders and yeomen of the county, which presented Salisbury with an uncompromising demand, dated 1 Apr. 1611, for the total abolition of purveyance, specifically including carriages for the royal stables.SP14/63/1.

Coningsby was elected to represent Hertfordshire in the 1614 Parliament. On the first day of business, 8 Apr., he was named to the privileges committee and to consider the extension, revival or repeal of statutes.Procs. 1614 (Commons), 33, 35. He was among those ordered to prepare a protestation against ‘undertakers’ (13 Apr.) and to consider a bill against false bail (16 April).Ibid. 76, 91. On 18 May, at the second reading of a bill to restrain the removal of cases from local courts to Westminster Hall, he urged that the committee ‘might consider of the great abuse that Hertfordshire received by the knight marshal’s men’ (the officers of the Court of the Verge), when the king was in residence at Royston or Theobalds. As a speaker in the debate he was entitled to attend the committee, but the content of his speech went unrecorded. Since Hertfordshire was noted for its malt industry, he was named to a committee for bills to exclude brewers from the commission of the peace, and to repress drunkenness (31 May).Ibid. 284, 395.

Coningsby drew up his will on 14 Mar. 1616, by which time he was ‘sick in body’, leaving his principal estate to his second wife. His eldest son Francis was to receive an annual allowance of £150 during her lifetime if he married in accordance with the wishes of six trustees, including Sir John Luke* and Sir John Boteler*.PROB 11/127, f. 272v. His death nine days later, shortly after Sir Thomas Dacres and Sir Rowland Lytton*, meant that Hertfordshire was suddenly ‘left naked of three good patriots and deputy lieutenants’.Chamberlain Letters, i. 616; C142/765/34. His second son, Thomas, who inherited North Mimms in 1630, represented St. Albans in the Short Parliament of 1640.