Although the Cunynghames of Livingstone, the Dundases of Dundas, and the Hamiltons of Ballencrieff had strong local interests, control of Linlithgowshire lay in the 2nd Earl of Hopetoun, who, as hereditary sheriff of the county, saw to it that the Members returned suited his own interest.

Up to 1750 Lanarkshire was usually represented by relations of the Tory dukes of Hamilton, its hereditary sheriffs. The only exception was James Lockart, a Whig, who was returned in 1715, when the 5th Duke was a minor. On Lockhart’s death in 1718, the Duke being still under age, his uncle, Lord Archibald Hamilton, took the seat, twice defeating Lockhart’s kinsman, Sir James Stewart.

In 1715 and 1722 Alexander Murray of Broughton, a Whig related to the Marquess of Annandale, the hereditary steward, was returned unopposed. In 1724 riots against the enclosure of lands in Galloway led to disagreement among the leading county families as to how the rioters should be treated. Some, led by Patrick Heron, were in favour of

Kinross-shire was controlled by its hereditary sheriff, John Hope, from 1729 Sir John Bruce Hope, who was accused of using his office ‘to engross to himself the whole power of electing as well as returning the representatives of that shire’.

The principal interest in Kincardineshire had been that of George Keith, Earl Marischal, the hereditary sheriff of the county, a Jacobite who was attainted for his part in the Fifteen, whereupon the Government nominated deputy sheriffs as the returning officer.

The chief interest in Inverness-shire was that of Simon Fraser, Lord Lovat, who had ‘the best estate in the shire’.Spalding Club Misc. ii. 8. In 1715 John Forbes was successful with the support of Lovat, whose claim to Fraserdale Forbes supported against that of the rival candidate, Alexander Mackenzie, a Jacobite who had gained possession of the estate.

The shire was represented from 1708 till 1741 by John Cockburn, who had previously represented it in the last Parliament of Scotland. Owing to the expense of his pioneering experiments in agriculture, he was forced to mortgage and in the end sell his estates, thus losing the family interest. His place was taken in 1741 by the Marquess of Tweeddale’s brother, Lord Charles Hay, who did not stand in 1747, perhaps because of a bout of insanity the previous year.

The leading Forfarshire families were the Maules, the Ogilvies, the Carnegies, and the Lyons. Under George I these families were in eclipse owing to their participation in the rebellion of 1715, for which the heads of the first three were attainted, forfeiting their estates and fleeing the country, the fourth being killed at the battle of Sheriffmuir. From 1716, when John Carnegie, who had been re-elected for the county in 1715, was expelled from the House for taking part in the rebellion, the seat was filled by James Scott, a government supporter.

In 1715 Sir John Anstruther, the head of one of the leading local Whig families, was returned, presumably with the support of his cousin, the Earl of Rothes, hereditary sheriff of the county and a member of the Squadrone. The defeated candidate, Sir Alexander Erskine, 2nd Bt., of Cambo, the lord lyon king of arms, later engaged in the 1715 rebellion. Anstruther continued to represent the county until 1741, when he was succeeded by David Scott, an opposition Whig.

The hereditary sheriff of Elginshire was the 7th Earl of Moray, who had been implicated in the Fifteen and thereafter took little part in politics. The chief interest was that of the Grants of Grant. After Alexander Grant’s death in 1719, the head of the Grant family, Sir James Grant, who was sitting for Inverness-shire, supported another local family, the Brodies, for the seat. In 1735 he made over the Grant estates to his son Ludovick, who was put up as the government candidate for the county in 1741.