Right of election

in the freemen

Background Information

Number of voters: 200-300

Constituency business
Date Candidate Votes
27 Jan. 1715 SIR JOHN HYNDE COTTON
196
THOMAS SCLATER
175
Samuel Shepheard
156
John Jenyns Jun.
105
SHEPHEARD vice Sclater, on petition, 27 May 1715
22 Mar. 1722 SIR JOHN HYNDE COTTON
THOMAS BACON (FORMERLY SCLATER)
25 Oct. 1722 GILBERT AFFLECK vice Cotton, chose to sit for Cambridgeshire
25 Aug. 1727 SIR JOHN HYNDE COTTON
137
THOMAS BACON
126
Henry Bromley
63
26 Apr. 1734 SIR JOHN HYNDE COTTON
THOMAS BACON
10 Feb. 1737 GILBERT AFFLECK vice Bacon, deceased
131
Dingley Askham
115
6 May 1741 THOMAS HAY, Visct. Dupplin
JAMES MARTIN
28 Dec. 1744 CHRISTOPHER JEAFFRESON vice Martin, deceased
24 Nov. 1746 DUPPLIN re-elected after appointment to office
26 June 1747 SAMUEL SHEPHEARD
THOMAS HAY, Visct. Dupplin
6 May 1748 CHRISTOPHER JEAFFRESON vice Shepheard, deceased
31 Jan. 1749 CHARLES SLOANE CADOGAN vice Jeaffreson, deceased
Main Article

Cambridge elections were controlled by the corporation, a Tory body, who were able to manipulate the franchise by creating honorary freemen. At George I’s accession the dominant interest in the corporation was that of Sir John Hynde Cotton, the head of the Cambridgeshire Tories, who had shared the representation since 1708 with Samuel Shepheard, a Hanoverian Tory, who had gone over to the Whigs. On 6 Sept. 1714 a Cambridge Tory reported that ‘we are preparing here to throw out Shepheard by promoting Mr. Sclater’s interest’, soon after which the corporation admitted 36 new freemen, whose votes resulted in Sclater’s defeating Shepheard by a majority of 19. Shepheard petitioned on the ground that these votes were invalid, as the meetings of the corporation at which the new freemen had been admitted did not contain a majority of the aldermen. Sclater’s return was upheld by the elections committee, who decided that a majority of the aldermen was unnecessary, but a resolution to this effect was rejected by the House of Commons, who awarded the seat to Shepheard.1HMC Portland, v. 493; CJ, xviii. 142-6. At the next general election Sclater, now Bacon, was unopposed with Cotton, who was replaced by another Tory, Gilbert Affleck, on choosing to sit for the county. In 1727 Cotton and Bacon were re-elected, defeating Henry Bromley, later Lord Montfort, a Whig. The tide turned at a by-election in 1737, when Cotton’s candidate was defeated by Affleck, supported by Shepheard’s interest. From that moment, according to Cole, the Cambridge antiquary,

it was visible that Sir John Cotton’s interest with the corporation was lost and gone, for the aldermen, though almost all of them were Tories in their hearts, wanted their Members to be more free with their money among them than they found Sir John Cotton was, who they gave out, never traded with them for the necessaries of his house at Madingley, but sent to London or anywhere else where he could purchase the cheapest ... and the court party, or Whigs, seeing the aldermen and managing men gaping for money, it was found for them by Lord Montfort and Mr. Shepheard.2Add. 5841, f. 337.

Thenceforth government supporters were returned for both seats without opposition.

Author
Notes
  • 1. HMC Portland, v. 493; CJ, xviii. 142-6.
  • 2. Add. 5841, f. 337.